Course Catalog
Providers using this tag (89)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 48 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (65)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 28 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (15)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Course Catalog” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Higher Education and Research | 26% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 89 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Course Catalog, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 39 | 18.2 | +20.8 | 89 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 31.5 | 22.1 | +9.4 | 89 |
| Discoverability | 65.7 | 57.9 | +7.8 | 89 |
| Contract Governance | 14.2 | 9.4 | +4.8 | 89 |
| Operational Transparency | 14.2 | 12.4 | +1.8 | 89 |
| Access Clarity | 24 | 25 | -1 | 89 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 0% | 16% | -16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 0% | 14% | -14 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 36% | 13% | +23 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 76% | 35% | +41 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 University of Waterloo 61.2
- 2 University of Macau 50.8
- 3 University of Helsinki 49.2
- 4 University of Warwick 47.9
- 5 University of Lausanne 46.1
- 6 Stanford University 44.8
- 7 University of Amsterdam 44
- 8 Rice University 43.7
- 9 University of California, Santa Barbara 43.3
- 10 University of Warsaw 43.1
- 1 Rice University 44.8
- 2 Columbia University 41
- 3 Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 33.6
- 4 University of New South Wales 32.8
- 5 University of Ottawa 32.7
- 6 University of Macau 31.7
- 7 Shanghai Jiao Tong University 31.4
- 8 National University of Singapore 30.5
- 9 Hamad Bin Khalifa University 30.1
- 10 University of Amsterdam 29.8
Coverage caveat. 67 of 89 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 7 November 2026, across 38912 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.