Business
BusinessesBusiness
Providers using this tag (104)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 20 Limited public surface area
Emerging 27 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 45 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (90)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 30 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 21 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 15 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (69)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Business” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 69 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 82 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Business, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 19.5 | 18.2 | +1.3 | 82 |
| Contract Governance | 9.8 | 9.4 | +0.4 | 82 |
| Discoverability | 57.3 | 57.9 | -0.6 | 82 |
| Operational Transparency | 8.1 | 12.4 | -4.3 | 82 |
| Access Clarity | 20.4 | 25 | -4.6 | 82 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 14.9 | 22.1 | -7.2 | 82 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 26% | 16% | +10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 22% | 14% | +8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 13% | +3 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 39% | 35% | +4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 LinkedIn 76.4
- 2 Astranexo 51.2
- 3 Compabase 48.8
- 4 Entitylight 46.6
- 5 wbiztool-com 46.3
- 6 Directories.ai 45.9
- 7 Baselayer 42.4
- 8 Answer Checkup 42.2
- 9 Archstone 41.4
- 10 Butterbase 40.5
- 1 Astranexo 66.7
- 2 Granola 54.8
- 3 Akeda 54.4
- 4 Compabase 52.5
- 5 Agentifizierung 49
- 6 LinkedIn 47.4
- 7 wbiztool-com 47.1
- 8 CoworkingView API 40.3
- 9 DBT Capital 39.2
- 10 Phone Inc 38.5
Coverage caveat. 64 of 82 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 7 November 2026, across 38912 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.