Task Management
Providers using this tag (34)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (7)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Task Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 31 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Task Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 37.7 | 19.8 | +17.9 | 31 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 37.6 | 23.4 | +14.2 | 31 |
| Access Clarity | 38 | 26.5 | +11.5 | 31 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.3 | 14 | +10.3 | 31 |
| Discoverability | 67.7 | 61.2 | +6.5 | 31 |
| Contract Governance | 8 | 6.4 | +1.6 | 31 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 26% | 10% | +16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 29% | 13% | +16 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 29% | 11% | +18 |
| Security | 91% | 97% | -6 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 21% | 14% | +7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Asana 66.6
- 2 Taskfolk 61.1
- 3 Connecteam 59.8
- 4 Microsoft Planner 57.8
- 5 Todoist 49.9
- 6 Yoobic 49.5
- 7 Favro 45.8
- 8 Wrike 45.6
- 9 Google Tasks 45.2
- 10 Process Street 44.7
- 1 Taskfolk 69.2
- 2 Nova Lima 46.4
- 3 Connecteam 43.3
- 4 Process Street 39.7
- 5 Asana 39.6
- 6 Yoobic 33.6
- 7 Superlist 31.1
- 8 Microsoft Planner 29.9
- 9 Trail 29.7
- 10 Wrike 28.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.