Tables
TABLESTablestables
Providers using this tag (82)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 33 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 27 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (85)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 31 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 27 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 82 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Tables, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 53.8 | 17.5 | +36.3 | 82 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.8 | 17.9 | +25.9 | 82 |
| Access Clarity | 41.3 | 22.3 | +19 | 82 |
| Operational Transparency | 28.4 | 11.3 | +17.1 | 82 |
| Contract Governance | 19.5 | 6.4 | +13.1 | 82 |
| Discoverability | 72.8 | 60.4 | +12.4 | 82 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 38% | 16% | +22 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 22% | 7% | +15 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 32% | 9% | +23 |
| Security | 99% | 88% | +11 |
| Arazzo workflows | 18% | 2% | +16 |
| Governance rules | 57% | 13% | +44 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 83.3
- 2 HubSpot 82.4
- 3 Treasure Data 76.7
- 4 Lusha 71.7
- 5 Canva 69
- 6 S&P Global 64.6
- 7 Coda Project 64.2
- 8 Airtable 62.1
- 9 Amazon Keyspaces 61.3
- 10 Clay 61.3
- 1 S&P Global 63.7
- 2 Lusha 57.6
- 3 Coda Project 55.5
- 4 HubSpot 54.4
- 5 Clarifeye 53.8
- 6 Salesforce 52.2
- 7 Canva 49.1
- 8 Treasure Data 48.4
- 9 Tyro Payments 44.7
- 10 Clay 41.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/tables"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/tables"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/tables/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.