Profile
Profileprofile
Providers using this tag (80)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 26 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 28 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (80)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 26 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 28 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 80 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Profile, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 50.8 | 17.5 | +33.3 | 80 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 39.2 | 17.9 | +21.3 | 80 |
| Access Clarity | 41.7 | 22.3 | +19.4 | 80 |
| Operational Transparency | 29.2 | 11.3 | +17.9 | 80 |
| Discoverability | 73.1 | 60.4 | +12.7 | 80 |
| Contract Governance | 16.3 | 6.4 | +9.9 | 80 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 39% | 16% | +23 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 7% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 24% | 9% | +15 |
| Security | 98% | 88% | +10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 9% | 2% | +7 |
| Governance rules | 45% | 13% | +32 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 83.3
- 2 Financial Modeling Prep 72.8
- 3 Fitbit 67.6
- 4 Factset 64.8
- 5 Bonitasoft 64.1
- 6 Slack 62.3
- 7 Compresr 61.4
- 8 SendHub 60.7
- 9 Koyeb 60.5
- 10 Oracle Hospitality 60.5
- 1 Automattic 62.3
- 2 Bluecore 54.1
- 3 Factset 52.8
- 4 Salesforce 52.2
- 5 Financial Modeling Prep 44
- 6 Avito 42.6
- 7 RunWhen 42.6
- 8 Wise 42.4
- 9 RingCentral 41.4
- 10 Replicas 39.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/profile"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/profile"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/profile/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.