Participants
Participantsparticipants
Providers using this tag (29)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (30)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 29 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Participants, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 52.1 | 17.5 | +34.6 | 29 |
| Operational Transparency | 32.8 | 11.3 | +21.5 | 29 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 38.7 | 17.9 | +20.8 | 29 |
| Access Clarity | 40.6 | 22.3 | +18.3 | 29 |
| Discoverability | 73.3 | 60.4 | +12.9 | 29 |
| Contract Governance | 18.6 | 6.4 | +12.2 | 29 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 31% | 16% | +15 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 10% | 7% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 48% | 9% | +39 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 14% | 2% | +12 |
| Governance rules | 48% | 13% | +35 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Twilio 73.4
- 2 Efí Pay (Gerencianet) 70.6
- 3 Impact 67.8
- 4 8x8 67.1
- 5 Slack 62.3
- 6 Benzinga 54.9
- 7 Coviu 52.2
- 8 Trato 48.5
- 9 Webex 48.2
- 10 Amazon Connect 47.3
- 1 401GO 46.9
- 2 Webex 43.5
- 3 8x8 43.3
- 4 Impact 41.5
- 5 Twilio 38.5
- 6 Allianz Engagement Survey 30.9
- 7 Coviu 30.8
- 8 Amazon Connect 30.6
- 9 Slack 29.4
- 10 Benzinga 27.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/participants"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/participants"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/participants/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.