Multiplayer
Providers using this tag (46)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 16 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (19)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 46 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Multiplayer, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.2 | 17.9 | +7.3 | 46 |
| Access Clarity | 28.2 | 22.3 | +5.9 | 46 |
| Operational Transparency | 16.1 | 11.3 | +4.8 | 46 |
| Discoverability | 61.4 | 60.4 | +1 | 46 |
| Contract Quality | 18.1 | 17.5 | +0.6 | 46 |
| Contract Governance | 5.4 | 6.4 | -1 | 46 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 16% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 7% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 4% | 9% | -5 |
| Security | 85% | 88% | -3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 15% | 13% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Heroic Labs 70.4
- 2 Unity 58.2
- 3 Liveblocks 55.3
- 4 Amazon GameLift 53.3
- 5 Gameye 52.7
- 6 PlayFab 49.8
- 7 Epic Games 47
- 8 Unity 45
- 9 PartyKit 40.6
- 10 Nakama 40.2
- 1 BetSolutions 30.6
- 2 Gameye 26.8
- 3 Amazon GameLift 24.8
- 4 Microsoft Products 24.8
- 5 Heroic Labs 24.6
- 6 Epic Games 22.7
- 7 Unity 22.7
- 8 Hathora 22.3
- 9 Liveblocks 22.1
- 10 Nakama 20.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/multiplayer"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/multiplayer"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/multiplayer/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.