GDPR
Providers using this tag (44)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (17)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (16)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “GDPR” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 43 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged GDPR, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 59.9 | 26.5 | +33.4 | 43 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 47.3 | 23.2 | +24.1 | 43 |
| Operational Transparency | 34.7 | 13.7 | +21 | 43 |
| Contract Quality | 34.8 | 17.6 | +17.2 | 43 |
| Contract Governance | 16.1 | 6.3 | +9.8 | 43 |
| Discoverability | 66.4 | 58.1 | +8.3 | 43 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 30% | 14% | +16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 26% | 12% | +14 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 9% | 2% | +7 |
| Governance rules | 23% | 14% | +9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Didomi 81
- 2 Svix 76.7
- 3 Tvarka ATK API 70.1
- 4 Matomo 70
- 5 Pirsch 68.5
- 6 Statable Stats API 65.9
- 7 JuriSign 65.3
- 8 Umami 63.5
- 9 Plausible 63.2
- 10 Simple Analytics 62.8
- 1 Minds 63
- 2 Statable Stats API 57.6
- 3 Insider 51.6
- 4 Svix 49.4
- 5 Tvarka ATK API 46.2
- 6 Apstal 38.8
- 7 TrustArc 38.7
- 8 Matomo 37.4
- 9 Cognism 36.9
- 10 Apsis19b1 36
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.