emerging · -1.5 market domain

GDPR

Score 21.0 / 100 82 providers +17 via APIs 19 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Compliance Management 3

Providers using this tag (82)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 10 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 16 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (19)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (17)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “GDPR” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Ada AINumbers.co Amplitude Annex Cloud Brix Conviva GEOCitation ID Analyzer June MoEngage Moodle Qualified Reachdesk Singular Tealium Ultimate.ai Yahoo

Score breakdown

Frequency
51.5
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.1
spread across providers
Quality lift
39.2
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Where this tag sits

Privacy broader CCPA 15 providers

Related tags

CCPA 17 co-occurrences Consent Management 11 co-occurrences Privacy 40 co-occurrences Web Analytics 9 co-occurrences DSAR 7 co-occurrences Consent 10 co-occurrences Cookie Consent 6 co-occurrences Cookieless 5 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag82
Api tag19
Openapi tag6
Openapi op tag10

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 77 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged GDPR, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
77
of 82 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
40.4
+16.3 vs catalog 24.1
Mean Agent Readiness
23.9
+9.8 vs catalog 14.1
Spread
3.4–78.8
median 39.1 · σ 19.7
How the 77 split by band
Exemplar 10Strong 16Developing 11Thin 18Emerging 18Minimal 4
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Access Clarity 59.5 30 +29.5 77
Developer Ergonomics 39.4 24.5 +14.9 77
Operational Transparency 24.5 13.2 +11.3 77
Contract Quality 29.1 18.6 +10.5 77
Contract Governance 18.5 9.7 +8.8 77
Discoverability 65.8 59.1 +6.7 77

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 36% 18% +18
MCP server (first-party) 32% 16% +16
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 21% 13% +8
Security 100% 99% +1
Arazzo workflows 5% 1% +4
Governance rules 56% 36% +20

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Didomi 78.8
  2. 2 Svix 74.7
  3. 3 Tvarka ATK API 73.9
  4. 4 Umami 72.8
  5. 5 Matomo 70.7
  6. 6 Statable Stats API 69.7
  7. 7 Prisma Reviews 68.8
  8. 8 Opper AI 68.3
  9. 9 JuriSign 67.9
  10. 10 Pirsch 67.2
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Prisma Reviews 64.7
  2. 2 Minds 61.6
  3. 3 Statable Stats API 58.5
  4. 4 Svix 53.1
  5. 5 Insider 52.6
  6. 6 Famulor 52.2
  7. 7 Tvarka ATK API 48.1
  8. 8 Cookie Free Analytics 48
  9. 9 Compelling 46.9
  10. 10 eusend-dev 43.6
All 82 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 77 carry a score (94%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 46 of 77 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/gdpr"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.