GDPR
GDPRGdpr
Providers using this tag (42)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (17)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (14)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “GDPR” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 40 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged GDPR, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 57.6 | 26.5 | +31.1 | 40 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 47.3 | 23.4 | +23.9 | 40 |
| Operational Transparency | 36.5 | 14 | +22.5 | 40 |
| Contract Quality | 38 | 19.8 | +18.2 | 40 |
| Contract Governance | 15.4 | 6.4 | +9 | 40 |
| Discoverability | 67.9 | 61.2 | +6.7 | 40 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 25% | 10% | +15 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 25% | 13% | +12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 18% | 11% | +7 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 23% | 14% | +9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Svix 80.4
- 2 Didomi 76.6
- 3 Tvarka ATK API 68.9
- 4 Pirsch 68
- 5 Matomo 66.7
- 6 123FormBuilder 64.2
- 7 JuriSign 63.1
- 8 Simple Analytics 62.4
- 9 Umami 61.2
- 10 Plausible 60.7
- 1 Insider 51.6
- 2 Svix 49.4
- 3 Tvarka ATK API 46.2
- 4 Matomo 39.5
- 5 Apstal 38.8
- 6 TrustArc 38.7
- 7 Cognism 36.9
- 8 JuriSign 36.8
- 9 Sourcepoint 32.9
- 10 Pirsch 32
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.