Databases
Databasesdatabases
Providers using this tag (25)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (68)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 10 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 24 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 24 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (57)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Databases” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 57 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 24 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Databases, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 51.8 | 23.4 | +28.4 | 24 |
| Contract Quality | 43.6 | 19.8 | +23.8 | 24 |
| Operational Transparency | 32.4 | 14 | +18.4 | 24 |
| Access Clarity | 37.4 | 26.5 | +10.9 | 24 |
| Discoverability | 66.7 | 61.2 | +5.5 | 24 |
| Contract Governance | 11.8 | 6.4 | +5.4 | 24 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 36% | 10% | +26 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 36% | 13% | +23 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 11% | +1 |
| Security | 92% | 97% | -5 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 28% | 14% | +14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Amazon Web Services (AWS) 78.2
- 2 CData 74.6
- 3 Airtable 62
- 4 IBM 60
- 5 EHRbase 51.1
- 6 Adaptive Automation Technologies 50
- 7 Neon 49.6
- 8 Dokploy 48.9
- 9 Render 48.6
- 10 Superblocks 47.1
- 1 CData 64
- 2 EHRbase 50
- 3 IBM 37.3
- 4 Amazon Web Services (AWS) 37.2
- 5 Render 36.6
- 6 Airtable 36
- 7 Dokploy 32
- 8 Sevalla 30.1
- 9 Adaptive Automation Technologies 28.6
- 10 Superblocks 28.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.