emerging · 0.0 marketcapability domainschema

NoSQL

Score 23.8 / 100 32 providers +10 via APIs 21 APIs Search apis.io →
Variants seen in the corpus: NoSQLnosql

Providers using this tag (32)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored

APIs with this tag (21)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (10)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “NoSQL” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Amazon Web Services (AWS) Cloudera IBM JD.com (Jingdong) MySQL Oracle Oracle Database SAP HANA Spring Data

Score breakdown

Frequency
48.0
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.9
spread across providers
Quality lift
45.1
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
17.2
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Document Database 9 co-occurrences Key-Value 8 co-occurrences Database 36 co-occurrences MongoDB 6 co-occurrences Document Store 5 co-occurrences Key-Value Store 5 co-occurrences Replication 6 co-occurrences Cluster 13 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag32
Api tag21
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag17

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 29 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged NoSQL, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
29
all scored
Mean Kin Score
42.1
+18.2 vs catalog 23.9
Mean Agent Readiness
24.1
+12.1 vs catalog 12
Spread
10.8–74.6
median 41.8 · σ 14.1
How the 29 split by band
Exemplar 1Strong 4Developing 13Thin 8Emerging 2Minimal 1
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Contract Quality 52.2 19.8 +32.4 29
Developer Ergonomics 46.8 23.4 +23.4 29
Operational Transparency 26.4 14 +12.4 29
Access Clarity 37 26.5 +10.5 29
Contract Governance 14.8 6.4 +8.4 29
Discoverability 66.2 61.2 +5 29

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 13% 10% +3
MCP server (first-party) 17% 13% +4
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 23% 11% +12
Security 97% 97% 0
Arazzo workflows 13% 2% +11
Governance rules 50% 14% +36

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 CData 74.6
  2. 2 Amazon DynamoDB 62.3
  3. 3 Amazon Keyspaces 61.3
  4. 4 Amazon DocumentDB 59.1
  5. 5 Amazon DynamoDB 58.5
  6. 6 Couchbase 54
  7. 7 ScyllaDB 51.9
  8. 8 Amazon SimpleDB 50.9
  9. 9 MongoDB 49.3
  10. 10 ArangoDB 47.2
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 CData 64
  2. 2 MongoDB 50
  3. 3 Amazon DynamoDB 33.1
  4. 4 Apache CouchDB 31.7
  5. 5 Amazon DynamoDB 31.3
  6. 6 Macrometa 30.7
  7. 7 ArangoDB 27.8
  8. 8 Elasticsearch 26.1
  9. 9 Amazon SimpleDB 25.5
  10. 10 Amazon DocumentDB 24.8
All 32 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in the catalog.Generated from the catalog build of 15 September 2026, across 27661 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/nosql"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/nosql"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/nosql/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.