Platform-as-a-Service
PaaSPaasPlatform-as-a-Serviceplatform-as-a-service
Providers using this tag (46)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (10)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (4)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Platform-as-a-Service” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 44 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Platform-as-a-Service, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 52.1 | 23.4 | +28.7 | 44 |
| Contract Quality | 42.1 | 19.8 | +22.3 | 44 |
| Operational Transparency | 35.7 | 14 | +21.7 | 44 |
| Access Clarity | 47.1 | 26.5 | +20.6 | 44 |
| Discoverability | 68.7 | 61.2 | +7.5 | 44 |
| Contract Governance | 11.9 | 6.4 | +5.5 | 44 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 37% | 10% | +27 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 39% | 13% | +26 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 30% | 11% | +19 |
| Security | 98% | 97% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 13% | 2% | +11 |
| Governance rules | 28% | 14% | +14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Amazon Web Services (AWS) 78.2
- 2 Microsoft Azure 73.3
- 3 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 71.1
- 4 Oracle Platforms 69.5
- 5 Koyeb 64.2
- 6 OutSystems 59.5
- 7 Google Cloud Platform 59.4
- 8 Amazon Elastic Beanstalk 58.1
- 9 Laravel 57.7
- 10 Cloud Foundry 56.2
- 1 Deployxa 56.3
- 2 Upsun 54.5
- 3 Platform.sh 49.5
- 4 Microsoft Azure 46.2
- 5 Oracle Platforms 45
- 6 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 42.5
- 7 Google Cloud Platform 42.3
- 8 Laravel 41.2
- 9 Unqork 40.8
- 10 Koyeb 39.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.