Platform-as-a-Service
Platform as a ServicePaaS
Providers using this tag (40)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (8)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (4)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Platform-as-a-Service” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 39 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Platform-as-a-Service, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 50 | 23.2 | +26.8 | 39 |
| Contract Quality | 36.9 | 17.6 | +19.3 | 39 |
| Operational Transparency | 32.5 | 13.7 | +18.8 | 39 |
| Access Clarity | 44.9 | 26.5 | +18.4 | 39 |
| Discoverability | 65 | 58.1 | +6.9 | 39 |
| Contract Governance | 10.5 | 6.3 | +4.2 | 39 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 44% | 14% | +30 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 41% | 12% | +29 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 36% | 11% | +25 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 13% | 2% | +11 |
| Governance rules | 26% | 14% | +12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 76.4
- 2 Microsoft Azure 76.2
- 3 OutSystems 75.8
- 4 Laravel 69.5
- 5 Koyeb 63.5
- 6 Google Cloud Platform 62.9
- 7 Upsun 60.1
- 8 Deployxa 59.4
- 9 Cloud Foundry 58.8
- 10 Aptible 58.5
- 1 Upsun 60.6
- 2 Platform.sh 56.3
- 3 Deployxa 54.1
- 4 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 49.3
- 5 Microsoft Azure 48.4
- 6 Sevalla 46.3
- 7 Google Cloud Platform 42.3
- 8 Cloud Foundry 42.2
- 9 Unqork 40.8
- 10 Koyeb 39.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.