Card Payments
Providers using this tag (26)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (18)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (9)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Card Payments” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 26 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Card Payments, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 56.8 | 23.4 | +33.4 | 26 |
| Contract Quality | 46.1 | 20.1 | +26 | 26 |
| Operational Transparency | 31.4 | 14 | +17.4 | 26 |
| Discoverability | 73.1 | 61 | +12.1 | 26 |
| Access Clarity | 37.9 | 26.5 | +11.4 | 26 |
| Contract Governance | 12 | 6.5 | +5.5 | 26 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 10% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 12% | 13% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 11% | +1 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 15% | 13% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 PayMongo 70.7
- 2 Paymob 60.4
- 3 Paymentsense 59.2
- 4 Dojo 56.4
- 5 Fat Zebra 55.7
- 6 Pinch Payments 55
- 7 Beam Checkout 54.6
- 8 Monoova 52.8
- 9 Trust Payments 52.5
- 10 Kushki 51.1
- 1 Moneris 52.6
- 2 Paymob 47.6
- 3 Pinch Payments 38.8
- 4 Dojo 35.7
- 5 Fat Zebra 35.4
- 6 Till Payments 35.4
- 7 Zettle 34.6
- 8 Monoova 32.1
- 9 PayMongo 29.6
- 10 Paymentsense 29.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.