Calendar
CalendarsCalendar
Providers using this tag (53)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
APIs with this tag (100)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 20 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 28 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 23 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 16 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (68)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Calendar” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 68 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 48 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Calendar, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 29 | 17.6 | +11.4 | 48 |
| Access Clarity | 34.4 | 26.5 | +7.9 | 48 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 28.3 | 23.2 | +5.1 | 48 |
| Operational Transparency | 18 | 13.7 | +4.3 | 48 |
| Contract Governance | 8.3 | 6.3 | +2 | 48 |
| Discoverability | 57.5 | 58.1 | -0.6 | 48 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 21% | 14% | +7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 21% | 12% | +9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 11% | +4 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 31% | 14% | +17 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Nylas 93.2
- 2 CycleCalcs 67
- 3 Chili Piper 66
- 4 Microsoft Outlook 66
- 5 Google Workspace 60.5
- 6 Microsoft Exchange 58.3
- 7 Amazon WorkMail 57.1
- 8 Calendarific 54.3
- 9 Checkiday - National Holiday and Event API 52.1
- 10 MeetsMore 47.8
- 1 Nylas 56.6
- 2 Chili Piper 55.6
- 3 CycleCalcs 49.4
- 4 SavvyCal 48.8
- 5 Cal.com 48
- 6 Microsoft Outlook 47.5
- 7 Luma 44.5
- 8 Calendly 43.1
- 9 Calendarific 31
- 10 Microsoft Exchange 30.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.