Budgeting
Providers using this tag (30)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (8)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Budgeting” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 29 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Budgeting, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 43.1 | 26.5 | +16.6 | 29 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.1 | 14 | +4.1 | 29 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 26.4 | 23.4 | +3 | 29 |
| Contract Governance | 8.7 | 6.5 | +2.2 | 29 |
| Discoverability | 62.1 | 61 | +1.1 | 29 |
| Contract Quality | 16.6 | 20.1 | -3.5 | 29 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 10% | 10% | 0 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 20% | 13% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 27% | 11% | +16 |
| Security | 97% | 96% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 13% | -3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Datarails 53.1
- 2 Cube 52.6
- 3 Cube Planning 50.2
- 4 OpenGov 49.7
- 5 Oracle Essbase 49.4
- 6 Everhour 41.5
- 7 Runway Financial 41.3
- 8 CCH Tagetik 39.8
- 9 Microsoft Project 38.5
- 10 Shelter 37.4
- 1 OpenGov 63.1
- 2 Datarails 59.2
- 3 Runway Financial 56
- 4 Cube 36.4
- 5 Cube Planning 36.4
- 6 CCH Tagetik 26.3
- 7 Microsoft Project 26.1
- 8 Oracle Essbase 25.5
- 9 Everhour 22.3
- 10 Buxfer 22.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.