White Label
Providers using this tag (36)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (19)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Cvent White Label APIThe Cvent White Label API enables venues and suppliers to embed Cvent RFP functionality into their own webs...Power BI Embedded APIPower BI Embedded enables developers to embed interactive Power BI reports, dashboards, and tiles into cust...Structify Whitelabel APIWhitelabeled service proxy endpoints
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Clevergy MicrofrontendsRoughly thirty embeddable UI components — custom elements (web components) rendering a React tree in an iso...Banuba Video Editor SDKBanuba Video Editor SDK is a complete white-label video and photo editing solution for iOS and Android with...Klavis MCP Platform APIThe Klavis API manages hosted MCP servers, OAuth flows for 50+ integrated services, Strata multi-tool serve...Make White LabelMake White Label provides OEM customers with the ability to manage and administrate their own white-labeled...June Embed APIPro Plan add-on API that allows embedding June analytics dashboards directly into customer-facing products,...
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
BaseKit REST APIPartner-facing REST API to provision and manage brands, users, packages, sites, custom domains, SSL certifi...Bird Platform (Fleet Operator)Bird Platform is the white-label fleet operator program that lets independent local operators run a Bird-br...Celcoin Card Solutions APIAPIs for white-label card account creation and management, card issuance and tracking, transaction simulati...Xoxoday Storefront Integration APIAPI for embedding a white-labeled reward storefront into existing applications via SSO/SAML. Enables end-us...Getnet White Label Merchant OperationsWhite-label merchant operations APIs covering terminal paper-roll ordering and merchant fee viewing and neg...
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Shakr Video Editor SDKEmbeddable, white-labeled drag-and-drop video editor for the browser (npm @shakrmedia/editor-sdk).Bitget Broker APIREST API for non-disclosed brokers to build independent trading platforms on top of Bitget infrastructure, ...Asaas Subaccounts / White-Label APICreate and manage subaccounts under a master account for white-label and BaaS use cases. Supports KYC docum...Playroll Partner Integration APIThe gated developer entry point for ATS, HRIS, accounting, and workforce platforms that want to embed Playr...Layla for Brands (White Label)White-label AI travel agent that travel companies can embed on their own site, customized with brand voice,...easyJet Brand Widget Service (easyDom)easyJet's hosted client-side widget platform for partner and white-label sites. Each widget is a script tag...
Companies reaching this through an API (13)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “White Label” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Frequency
47.5
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.9
spread across providers
Quality lift
38.2
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
3.6
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Connectors 5 co-occurrences
Templates 6 co-occurrences
Travel 5 co-occurrences
Integration 7 co-occurrences
Compliance 8 co-occurrences
Real-Time 5 co-occurrences
Automation 6 co-occurrences
Webhook 12 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag36
Api tag19
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag3
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 33 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged White Label, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
33
of 36 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
33.4
+10.5 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
18
+6.1 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
3.4–78
median 33.7 · σ 19.3
How the 33 split by band
Exemplar 2Strong 3Developing 8Thin 5Emerging 12Minimal 3
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 34.9 | 23.2 | +11.7 | 33 |
| Contract Quality | 29 | 17.6 | +11.4 | 33 |
| Access Clarity | 37.1 | 26.5 | +10.6 | 33 |
| Discoverability | 65.2 | 58.1 | +7.1 | 33 |
| Contract Governance | 11.7 | 6.3 | +5.4 | 33 |
| Operational Transparency | 19.1 | 13.7 | +5.4 | 33 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 14% | -8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 12% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 11% | +1 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 12% | 14% | -2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Cvent 78
- 2 Vendasta 70.8
- 3 Autoderm – AI Dermatology API 60.5
- 4 Firma.dev 60.5
- 5 GEOCitation 55.7
- 6 Clevergy 51
- 7 Cyclr 49.4
- 8 Albato 49.3
- 9 Cadana 48.2
- 10 Cardstream 46.9
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Cvent 42.6
- 2 Vendasta 40.8
- 3 Cadana 39
- 4 Bookit N Go 39
- 5 Open 38.3
- 6 GEOCitation 37.2
- 7 Firma.dev 36.7
- 8 Wazo 35
- 9 Clevergy 30.8
- 10 Duda 28.1
All 36 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 33 carry a score (92%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 26 of 33 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 26 of 33 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.