Threat Detection
Providers using this tag (107)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 23 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 23 Limited public surface area
Emerging 33 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 23 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (74)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 56 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (10)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Threat Detection” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 99 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Threat Detection, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 31.7 | 26.5 | +5.2 | 99 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 27.6 | 23.4 | +4.2 | 99 |
| Discoverability | 64.4 | 61.2 | +3.2 | 99 |
| Contract Quality | 22.6 | 19.8 | +2.8 | 99 |
| Contract Governance | 8.6 | 6.4 | +2.2 | 99 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.6 | 14 | +1.6 | 99 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 10% | +7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 13% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 14% | 14% | 0 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Cisco XDR 62.9
- 2 AppOmni 58.3
- 3 Amazon GuardDuty 57
- 4 Malwarebytes 54.6
- 5 OpenText Cybersecurity 54.2
- 6 Panther 53.9
- 7 Upwind 53
- 8 Amazon Security Lake 52.8
- 9 LevelBlue 47.3
- 10 Tanium 47.3
- 1 Upwind 43.7
- 2 Cisco XDR 38.5
- 3 Adlumin 38.2
- 4 Amazon GuardDuty 37.1
- 5 AppOmni 36.7
- 6 Stream.Security 34.4
- 7 Malwarebytes 32.5
- 8 Spyderbat 32.4
- 9 OpenText Cybersecurity 32.2
- 10 Stairwell 32.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.