Cloud Security
Providers using this tag (120)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 26 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 29 Limited public surface area
Emerging 30 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 28 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (29)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (4)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Cloud Security” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 109 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Cloud Security, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 31.4 | 23.4 | +8 | 109 |
| Contract Quality | 26.6 | 19.8 | +6.8 | 109 |
| Operational Transparency | 19.3 | 13.9 | +5.4 | 109 |
| Discoverability | 64.5 | 61.2 | +3.3 | 109 |
| Contract Governance | 9.5 | 6.4 | +3.1 | 109 |
| Access Clarity | 27.9 | 26.5 | +1.4 | 109 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 19% | 10% | +9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 17% | 13% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 11% | +1 |
| Security | 98% | 96% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 18% | 14% | +4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Aembit 71.5
- 2 Palo Alto Networks 71.1
- 3 Azure Key Vault 60.4
- 4 Cisco Umbrella 59.3
- 5 Cisco Secure Firewall 57.6
- 6 3-shake 56.7
- 7 JupiterOne 53.9
- 8 Panther 53.9
- 9 CloudGuard 53.7
- 10 Tenable 53.6
- 1 Aembit 57.2
- 2 Upwind 43.7
- 3 Coro 41
- 4 Armor 40.4
- 5 Palo Alto Networks 39.4
- 6 Cisco Secure Firewall 39.2
- 7 CyCognito 38.7
- 8 Tenable 36.7
- 9 Stream.Security 34.4
- 10 Rapid7 34
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.