Network Security
Providers using this tag (75)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 16 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 4 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (15)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Network Security” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 63 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Network Security, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 34.7 | 23.4 | +11.3 | 63 |
| Contract Quality | 28 | 19.8 | +8.2 | 63 |
| Contract Governance | 9.7 | 6.4 | +3.3 | 63 |
| Access Clarity | 29.7 | 26.5 | +3.2 | 63 |
| Operational Transparency | 17 | 14 | +3 | 63 |
| Discoverability | 64 | 61.2 | +2.8 | 63 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 15% | 10% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 12% | 13% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 96% | 97% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 22% | 14% | +8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Palo Alto Networks 71.1
- 2 Calico 71
- 3 Graphiant 58.1
- 4 Cisco Secure Firewall 57.6
- 5 Amazon Firewall Manager 56.7
- 6 Nord Security 54.7
- 7 AbuseIPDB 54.4
- 8 Microsoft Entra 52.8
- 9 Amazon Network Firewall 52.5
- 10 Tigera 51.9
- 1 Tigera 50.2
- 2 Nord Security 43.5
- 3 Calico 42.1
- 4 Palo Alto Networks 39.4
- 5 Cisco Secure Firewall 39.2
- 6 Forward Networks 31.6
- 7 Netography 31.3
- 8 Graphiant 30.7
- 9 Amazon Firewall Manager 30.6
- 10 Extreme Networks 29.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.