Network Security
Providers using this tag (74)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 14 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (14)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (5)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Network Security” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 62 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Network Security, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.8 | 23.2 | +12.6 | 62 |
| Contract Quality | 26.5 | 17.6 | +8.9 | 62 |
| Discoverability | 63 | 58.1 | +4.9 | 62 |
| Access Clarity | 30.7 | 26.5 | +4.2 | 62 |
| Operational Transparency | 17.7 | 13.7 | +4 | 62 |
| Contract Governance | 10 | 6.3 | +3.7 | 62 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 15% | 14% | +1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 12% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 91% | 98% | -7 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 24% | 14% | +10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Palo Alto Networks 76.9
- 2 Calico 66.3
- 3 Graphiant 59.8
- 4 Microsoft Entra 58.5
- 5 Amazon Firewall Manager 57.6
- 6 Cisco Secure Firewall 56.4
- 7 Nord Security 56.4
- 8 Tigera 55.9
- 9 Amazon Network Firewall 53.5
- 10 AbuseIPDB 51.5
- 1 Nord Security 43.5
- 2 Cisco Secure Firewall 39.2
- 3 Tigera 39.1
- 4 Palo Alto Networks 36.9
- 5 Calico 36.2
- 6 Forward Networks 31.6
- 7 Graphiant 30.7
- 8 Amazon Firewall Manager 30.6
- 9 Amazon Network Firewall 30.6
- 10 Netography 29.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.