Endpoint Security
Providers using this tag (66)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 11 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (13)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Endpoint Security” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 59 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Endpoint Security, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 35.3 | 26.5 | +8.8 | 59 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 31.7 | 23.4 | +8.3 | 59 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.2 | 14 | +8.2 | 59 |
| Discoverability | 66.9 | 61.2 | +5.7 | 59 |
| Contract Governance | 11.2 | 6.4 | +4.8 | 59 |
| Contract Quality | 22.7 | 19.8 | +2.9 | 59 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 10% | +7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 13% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 11% | +1 |
| Security | 98% | 97% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 14% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Iru 57.5
- 2 Malwarebytes 54.6
- 3 OpenText Cybersecurity 54.2
- 4 dope.security 54.1
- 5 Kolide 54.1
- 6 Fleet 52.8
- 7 Armor 51.1
- 8 Huntress 51.1
- 9 ThreatLocker 51.1
- 10 JAMF 48.3
- 1 Huntress 55.6
- 2 Armor 40.4
- 3 Adlumin 38.2
- 4 Iru 35.7
- 5 Malwarebytes 32.5
- 6 OpenText Cybersecurity 32.2
- 7 Deep Instinct 30.2
- 8 Kolide 28.6
- 9 dope.security 27.4
- 10 Koi Security 27.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.