Markets · bedrock market · provisional

Security (EDR, SIEM, SOAR)

Platform market (siem/soar content hubs and edr marketplaces). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.

25providers measured
24 (96.0%)declare their own
0 (0.0%)covered by others only
1 (4.0%)undeclared
2declare compatibility (report only, not weighted)
0in-market workflows shown (6 bridges)
Provisional. Provisional and unweighted: the Market layer is not part of the composite or agent readiness. Leader lists are read within a position, never as one ranking. A provider that declares nothing we can read is shown as undeclared, with no number: we never infer integrations.

Where this market publishes its structure

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-23 from the 25 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

gravity 4 · other companies invest to build on it

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Okta 71.0 8420 1746 / 6674 6639 4 36 partner-built 21%, unknown 78%
Splunk 62.0 1893 1316 / 577 396 1 10 partner-built 70%, provider-built 8%, ipaas-bridge 1%, unknown 21%
CrowdStrike 58.8 401 236 / 165 1 3 1 partner-built 68%, provider-built 28%, standard 2%, builds-on-platform 2%, distribution 1%
Microsoft Sentinel 51.8 501 241 / 260 17 0 0 partner-built 53%, provider-built 44%, unknown 3%

builds-on 6 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Zscaler 60.8 24 0 / 24 0 3 1 ipaas-bridge 4%, contract 12%, standard 28%, builds-on-platform 44%, distribution 12%
Netskope 55.3 21 0 / 21 0 3 0 contract 9%, standard 27%, builds-on-platform 50%, distribution 14%
Rapid7 54.6 30 0 / 30 0 2 0 contract 5%, standard 37%, builds-on-platform 47%, distribution 11%
Recorded Future 51.2 7 0 / 7 0 1 0 contract 14%, standard 29%, builds-on-platform 43%, distribution 14%
Darktrace 48.4 10 0 / 10 0 4 0 contract 8%, standard 17%, builds-on-platform 42%, distribution 33%
Cisco XDR 17.2 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 builds-on-platform 100%

standard 7 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Fortinet 61.4 21 0 / 21 0 3 0 contract 9%, standard 50%, builds-on-platform 27%, distribution 14%
Trellix 57.9 8 0 / 8 0 0 0 contract 25%, standard 50%, builds-on-platform 25%
SentinelOne 56.4 12 0 / 12 0 2 0 contract 17%, standard 42%, builds-on-platform 25%, distribution 17%
Proofpoint 55.8 14 0 / 14 0 1 1 ipaas-bridge 7%, contract 14%, standard 43%, builds-on-platform 29%, distribution 7%
Tenable 54.0 13 0 / 13 0 1 0 standard 62%, builds-on-platform 31%, distribution 8%
Sophos 52.7 12 0 / 12 0 2 0 standard 50%, builds-on-platform 33%, distribution 17%
Exabeam 51.7 3 0 / 3 0 0 0 standard 67%, builds-on-platform 33%

core 2 · builds the connectors its customers need

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Palo Alto Networks 71.7 1162 232 / 930 206 0 0 partner-built 22%, provider-built 60%, standard 1%, builds-on-platform 1%, unknown 16%
Elastic 57.0 453 0 / 453 45 1 2 partner-built 6%, provider-built 83%, standard 1%, builds-on-platform 1%, unknown 9%

mixed 5 · no single mode dominates

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
CyberArk 57.8 17 0 / 17 0 0 0 contract 12%, standard 41%, builds-on-platform 47%
Wiz 55.5 22 0 / 22 0 3 0 contract 9%, standard 41%, builds-on-platform 36%, distribution 14%
Snyk 55.2 26 0 / 26 0 4 1 ipaas-bridge 4%, contract 7%, standard 37%, builds-on-platform 37%, distribution 15%
Qualys 53.6 11 0 / 11 0 3 0 contract 17%, standard 33%, builds-on-platform 25%, distribution 25%
Securonix 50.5 9 0 / 9 0 1 0 contract 11%, standard 33%, builds-on-platform 44%, distribution 11%

undeclared 1 · declares nothing we can read: no number

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Microsoft Defender undeclared-----

Workflows

No in-market workflows yet; bridges: 6 (2 not yet mapped to a capability). In-market workflows only: a step on the market provider's side maps to this market's business capabilities (BC-620), and the partner is not a generic export/notify app (slack, microsoft-teams, pagerduty, servicenow, jira count as in-market here). Other workflows are counted as bridges (including any whose steps do not resolve to a capability yet). Methodology.

Generated 2026-10-24 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.