Security Operations
Security Operationssecurity-operations
Providers using this tag (46)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (6)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 46 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Security Operations, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 32.2 | 22.3 | +9.9 | 46 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 23.4 | 17.9 | +5.5 | 46 |
| Discoverability | 65.7 | 60.4 | +5.3 | 46 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.4 | 11.3 | +4.1 | 46 |
| Contract Governance | 10 | 6.4 | +3.6 | 46 |
| Contract Quality | 15.5 | 17.5 | -2 | 46 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 22% | 16% | +6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 7% | +6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 9% | +4 |
| Security | 98% | 88% | +10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 11% | 13% | -2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Panther 54
- 2 Picus Security 50.1
- 3 Cyware 46.9
- 4 Arctic Wolf 45.7
- 5 Tines 43.6
- 6 Trellix 43.5
- 7 Google Cloud Chronicle 42.9
- 8 Splunk SOAR 41.3
- 9 Scanner 40.8
- 10 Swimlane 40.2
- 1 Cyware 34.6
- 2 Panther 30.8
- 3 Scanner 29.6
- 4 Picus Security 27.8
- 5 Google Cloud Chronicle 24.8
- 6 Vectra AI 24.6
- 7 Arctic Wolf 23.2
- 8 Swimlane 22.3
- 9 Tines 22.3
- 10 Nebulock 21
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.