Mobile Money
Providers using this tag (29)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (15)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 29 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Mobile Money, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 32.1 | 17.9 | +14.2 | 29 |
| Contract Quality | 29.5 | 17.5 | +12 | 29 |
| Access Clarity | 29.3 | 22.3 | +7 | 29 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.5 | 11.3 | +4.2 | 29 |
| Discoverability | 64.2 | 60.4 | +3.8 | 29 |
| Contract Governance | 7.7 | 6.4 | +1.3 | 29 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 24% | 16% | +8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 7% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 9% | +5 |
| Security | 93% | 88% | +5 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 13% | -3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Paystack 71
- 2 M-Pesa (Safaricom Daraja) 64.3
- 3 Flutterwave 63.9
- 4 GSMA 59.8
- 5 Paga 57.6
- 6 Cellulant 54.7
- 7 Klasha 54.6
- 8 MTN Group 53.7
- 9 NALA 49.9
- 10 Orange Business 38.9
- 1 GSMA 42.2
- 2 NALA 38.2
- 3 MTN Group 35.7
- 4 Paga 35.4
- 5 Orange Business 31.7
- 6 M-Pesa (Safaricom Daraja) 29.6
- 7 Flutterwave 27.3
- 8 OPay 26.2
- 9 TerraPay 25.9
- 10 Paystack 25.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.