Invitations
Invitationsinvitations
Providers using this tag (55)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 20 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (51)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 20 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 55 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Invitations, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 52.7 | 17.5 | +35.2 | 55 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 42.1 | 17.9 | +24.2 | 55 |
| Operational Transparency | 33.9 | 11.3 | +22.6 | 55 |
| Access Clarity | 40.1 | 22.3 | +17.8 | 55 |
| Discoverability | 73.9 | 60.4 | +13.5 | 55 |
| Contract Governance | 16.8 | 6.4 | +10.4 | 55 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 42% | 16% | +26 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 24% | 7% | +17 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 33% | 9% | +24 |
| Security | 98% | 88% | +10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 9% | 2% | +7 |
| Governance rules | 33% | 13% | +20 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Lightspark 71.4
- 2 Natural AI 68.7
- 3 Vim 68.2
- 4 Punchh 67.6
- 5 Bentley Systems 64.1
- 6 Raygun 63.1
- 7 GitHub 62.4
- 8 ControlUp 61.8
- 9 LiveRamp 59.1
- 10 Clerk 57.1
- 1 Natural AI 67.6
- 2 Clarifeye 53.8
- 3 Lightspark 52.6
- 4 Openwork 52.6
- 5 Sadq Holding Limited 50.3
- 6 Vim 48.4
- 7 Tackle.io 46.7
- 8 GitHub 45.5
- 9 LiveRamp 41.4
- 10 Zavu 40.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/invitations"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/invitations"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/invitations/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.