Gated
Gatedgated
Providers using this tag (57)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (51)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 22 Limited public surface area
Emerging 19 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 57 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Gated, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Transparency | 22 | 11.3 | +10.7 | 57 |
| Contract Quality | 27.6 | 17.5 | +10.1 | 57 |
| Access Clarity | 32.4 | 22.3 | +10.1 | 57 |
| Discoverability | 66.9 | 60.4 | +6.5 | 57 |
| Contract Governance | 11.1 | 6.4 | +4.7 | 57 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 19.6 | 17.9 | +1.7 | 57 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 16% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 7% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 28% | 9% | +19 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 40% | 13% | +27 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 anecdotes 65.4
- 2 Delft University of Technology 62.4
- 3 University of Michigan-Ann Arbor 57.9
- 4 Southwest Power Pool 52.9
- 5 University of California, San Diego 51
- 6 University of New South Wales 50.7
- 7 Landgate 49.9
- 8 University of British Columbia 49.2
- 9 University of Edinburgh 46.9
- 10 University of Hong Kong 44.5
- 1 Southwest Power Pool 43.3
- 2 Landgate 39
- 3 anecdotes 36.7
- 4 Columbia University 36
- 5 University of Edinburgh 32.5
- 6 TEGNA 30.7
- 7 University of California, San Francisco 28.8
- 8 University of New South Wales 28.8
- 9 Wyndham Hotels & Resorts 28.8
- 10 University of California, San Diego 28.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/gated"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/gated"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/gated/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.