Field Service
Providers using this tag (80)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 26 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (9)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 80 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Field Service, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 30.1 | 22.3 | +7.8 | 80 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.8 | 11.3 | +4.5 | 80 |
| Discoverability | 64.4 | 60.4 | +4 | 80 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 20.6 | 17.9 | +2.7 | 80 |
| Contract Quality | 19.2 | 17.5 | +1.7 | 80 |
| Contract Governance | 6.3 | 6.4 | -0.1 | 80 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 21% | 16% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 7% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 9% | +1 |
| Security | 96% | 88% | +8 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 6% | 13% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 83.3
- 2 CompanyCam 57.1
- 3 MaintainX 56.5
- 4 Centrica 53.8
- 5 ServiceTitan 53.5
- 6 Track-POD 53.4
- 7 Circuit 53.1
- 8 SafetyCulture 51.5
- 9 Aquant 51.2
- 10 GoSpotCheck 49.8
- 1 Salesforce 52.2
- 2 Aquant 46.4
- 3 CompanyCam 39.7
- 4 Centrica 34.4
- 5 MaintainX 32.9
- 6 Track-POD 32.4
- 7 Circuit 29.1
- 8 IFS 28.7
- 9 Remberg 27.9
- 10 PlanRadar 27.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.