emerging · 0.1 marketcapability industryschemaresource

Developer Platform

Score 22.7 / 100 60 providers +6 via APIs 11 APIs Search apis.io →

Providers using this tag (60)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 23 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (11)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (6)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Developer Platform” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Bloomberg Professional Service Dream Sports ScreenCloud Software Development Lifecycle Tsinghua University Ultrahuman

Score breakdown

Frequency
50.6
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
46.0
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
3.1
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Permissions 5 co-occurrences Gaming 13 co-occurrences NFT 5 co-occurrences SDK 14 co-occurrences OpenID Connect 5 co-occurrences Wallets 6 co-occurrences Application 9 co-occurrences Social 5 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag60
Api tag11

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 59 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Developer Platform, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
59
of 60 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
38
+15.1 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
22.7
+10.8 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
0–87.5
median 40.1 · σ 19.3
How the 59 split by band
Exemplar 5Strong 5Developing 22Thin 9Emerging 13Minimal 5
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 51.8 23.2 +28.6 59
Contract Quality 32.9 17.6 +15.3 59
Operational Transparency 28.6 13.7 +14.9 59
Discoverability 66.8 58.1 +8.7 59
Access Clarity 33.2 26.5 +6.7 59
Contract Governance 11 6.3 +4.7 59

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 25% 14% +11
MCP server (first-party) 24% 12% +12
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 29% 11% +18
Security 98% 98% 0
Arazzo workflows 12% 2% +10
Governance rules 19% 14% +5

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Kinde 87.5
  2. 2 Medplum 79.1
  3. 3 Svix 76.7
  4. 4 iOS 69.7
  5. 5 Knock 68.1
  6. 6 Orange Business 64.9
  7. 7 Immutable 64.4
  8. 8 Weave 58.6
  9. 9 Hashnode 58.4
  10. 10 LucidLink 58.3
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Immutable 58.9
  2. 2 Knock 58.6
  3. 3 Tesser 56.1
  4. 4 Medplum 52
  5. 5 Svix 49.4
  6. 6 Sanity 48.9
  7. 7 Kinde 48.1
  8. 8 BP 44.4
  9. 9 Orange Business 43.5
  10. 10 Samsung 38.5
All 60 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 59 carry a score (98%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 46 of 59 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/developer-platform"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/developer-platform"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/developer-platform/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.