Consumer Data Right
Providers using this tag (30)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (1)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Score breakdown
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Australia Consumer Data Right register (accredited data recipients; banking, energy, non-bank lending) | 30% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 30 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Consumer Data Right, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 46.6 | 18.2 | +28.4 | 30 |
| Operational Transparency | 38.3 | 12.4 | +25.9 | 30 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.7 | 22.1 | +21.6 | 30 |
| Contract Governance | 25.6 | 9.4 | +16.2 | 30 |
| Discoverability | 70.1 | 57.9 | +12.2 | 30 |
| Access Clarity | 24.6 | 25 | -0.4 | 30 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 3% | 16% | -13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 14% | -11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 80% | 13% | +67 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 93% | 35% | +58 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Origin Energy 62.2
- 2 Amber Electric 59.9
- 3 Consumer Data Right (Energy) 59
- 4 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank 56.4
- 5 Endeavour Energy 56.3
- 6 AEMO 55.9
- 7 Red Energy 55
- 8 Macquarie Bank 50.2
- 9 Simply Energy 49.6
- 10 AGL Energy 44.8
- 1 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank 49.5
- 2 Amber Electric 47.5
- 3 Origin Energy 43
- 4 AEMO 39.2
- 5 Suncorp Bank 37.9
- 6 HSBC Bank Australia 37.9
- 7 Alex Bank 37.9
- 8 Consumer Data Right (Energy) 37.8
- 9 Endeavour Energy 35
- 10 Avenue Bank 30.8
Coverage caveat. 21 of 30 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 7 November 2026, across 38912 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.