Competitive Intelligence
Providers using this tag (34)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (9)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 33 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Competitive Intelligence, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 51.7 | 26.5 | +25.2 | 33 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 35 | 23.4 | +11.6 | 33 |
| Contract Quality | 30.7 | 20.1 | +10.6 | 33 |
| Discoverability | 69 | 61 | +8 | 33 |
| Operational Transparency | 21 | 14 | +7 | 33 |
| Contract Governance | 12.1 | 6.5 | +5.6 | 33 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 44% | 10% | +34 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 50% | 13% | +37 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 32% | 11% | +21 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 13% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 SimilarWeb 66.6
- 2 G2 66.2
- 3 Semrush 64.1
- 4 Reputation 61.8
- 5 Mention 59
- 6 SpyFu 56.3
- 7 Pomo 56.1
- 8 GEOCitation 55
- 9 Business Software and Services Reviews | G2 53
- 10 CrawlGraph 52.1
- 1 Clozd 59.5
- 2 G2 57.7
- 3 Business Software and Services Reviews | G2 54.5
- 4 SimilarWeb 50
- 5 Salesgraph 43.8
- 6 Adsmom Inc. 41.4
- 7 Pomo 39.3
- 8 AdMakeAI 38.1
- 9 SpyFu 37.2
- 10 GEOCitation 37.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.