Case Management
Providers using this tag (31)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (20)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Red Hat Case Management APIAPI for managing support cases through the Red Hat Customer Portal, supporting case creation, updates, comm...ComplyAdvantage Case Management APIComments, tags, assignment, and match status workflow on searches.Genesys Case Management APICase ManagementMalwarebytes Case Management APIThe Case Management APIs are for managing Managed Detection and Response (MDR) and Managed Threat Hunting (...Trisotech Automation (Service Execution) APIEvery service published to the Trisotech Service Library gets its own REST endpoint and its own generated O...Filevine Projects APIList, create, read, and update Filevine projects (matters/cases). Each project belongs to a project type, c...Amazon Connect Cases APIWith Amazon Connect Cases, agents can track and manage customer issues that require multiple interactions, ...AirMDR Case Manager APIThe Case Manager API from AirMDR — 32 operation(s) for case manager.
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Sumsub APISumsub's REST API provides programmatic access to a full-stack verification platform spanning identity veri...Pega DX APIThe Constellation Digital Experience (DX) API — REST endpoints external systems use to create Launchpad/Pla...Montran Case ManagementAn online system for the automatic processing of all inquiries related to payments, both foreign and domest...Montran Dispute ManagementProvides comprehensive dispute resolution capabilities for payment transactions, enabling financial institu...
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Cisco Case APIThe Case API returns Cisco TAC support case information — a summary or full detail for specific case IDs, o...UKG HR Service Delivery APIThe UKG HR Service Delivery API (formerly People Doc) provides access to employee request management, knowl...Everlaw REST APIThe Everlaw REST API provides programmatic access to the Everlaw eDiscovery platform, enabling automation o...eCASE Enterprise Case ManagementState Department-wide enterprise case-management platform. Internal system; referenced here for organizatio...
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Epiq AACER Bankruptcy APIThe AACER API enables real-time bankruptcy case information to be electronically transmitted system-to-syst...Sardine Case Management APIProgrammatic access to Sardine's unified case management surface for fraud and AML investigations. Cases ar...Security Cooperation Information Portal (SCIP)Government-to-government portal that hosts case management, financial, and logistical information for secur...
Companies reaching this through an API (15)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Case Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
AirMDR
Amazon Connect
ComplyAdvantage
Datadog
Defense Security Cooperation Agency
Department of State
Everlaw
Genesys
Malwarebytes
Montran
Red Hat
Sardine
Sumsub
Trisotech
UKG
Score breakdown
Frequency
46.7
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.8
spread across providers
Quality lift
36.0
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
6.3
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Personal Injury 6 co-occurrences
Business Process Management 5 co-occurrences
Legal Tech 12 co-occurrences
Legal 11 co-occurrences
AML 6 co-occurrences
Low-Code 5 co-occurrences
KYC 6 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Api tag20
Provider tag31
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag5
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 31 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Case Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
31
all scored
Mean Kin Score
29.2
+6.3 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
11.4
-0.5 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
3.1–65.8
median 26 · σ 16.6
How the 31 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 3Developing 5Thin 7Emerging 12Minimal 4
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 38.8 | 26.5 | +12.3 | 31 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 28.5 | 23.2 | +5.3 | 31 |
| Operational Transparency | 18 | 13.7 | +4.3 | 31 |
| Discoverability | 62 | 58.1 | +3.9 | 31 |
| Contract Quality | 21.5 | 17.6 | +3.9 | 31 |
| Contract Governance | 9.7 | 6.3 | +3.4 | 31 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 3% | 14% | -11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 12% | -9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 11% | -1 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 23% | 14% | +9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Bonitasoft 65.8
- 2 Filevine 57.4
- 3 Alloy 54.7
- 4 Dotfile 51.1
- 5 Pega 46.8
- 6 Splunk SOAR 44.7
- 7 Flowable 44.5
- 8 Mon Ami 41
- 9 PracticePanther 39
- 10 MyCase 38.5
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Dotfile 31.1
- 2 Alloy 29.1
- 3 PracticePanther 27.3
- 4 Bonitasoft 26.4
- 5 ProcessMaker 24
- 6 Mon Ami 23.6
- 7 Flowable 22.3
- 8 Swimlane 22.3
- 9 Tribute Technology 22.3
- 10 Filevine 22.1
All 31 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in
the catalog.
Coverage caveat. 21 of 31 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 21 of 31 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.