Bitcoin
Providers using this tag (67)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 19 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (29)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (5)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Bitcoin” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 64 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Bitcoin, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 31.7 | 23.2 | +8.5 | 64 |
| Contract Quality | 23.5 | 17.2 | +6.3 | 64 |
| Operational Transparency | 19 | 13 | +6 | 64 |
| Discoverability | 61 | 57.9 | +3.1 | 64 |
| Contract Governance | 8.2 | 6.5 | +1.7 | 64 |
| Access Clarity | 21.1 | 23.9 | -2.8 | 64 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 13% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 12% | +1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 11% | -5 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 20% | 16% | +4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 imgauth — API di attestazione opere digitali 66.3
- 2 Ripio 58.9
- 3 Voltage 53.6
- 4 Coinme 51.5
- 5 Safello 50.1
- 6 Luno 49.9
- 7 Blockchain.com 49.4
- 8 Acinq 46.8
- 9 BTC War Live Market Data API 45.7
- 10 CoinSpot 43.6
- 1 BTC War Live Market Data API 55.3
- 2 SnowSignals 52.1
- 3 Coinbase Commerce 42.8
- 4 Deribit 41.4
- 5 imgauth — API di attestazione opere digitali 35.9
- 6 Ripio 34.5
- 7 Safello 34.5
- 8 BitPay 33.9
- 9 OpenNode 32.1
- 10 WazirX 31.9
Coverage caveat. 59 of 64 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.