Account-to-Account
Providers using this tag (27)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (6)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Account-to-Account” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 27 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Account-to-Account, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 45.7 | 23.2 | +22.5 | 27 |
| Contract Quality | 38 | 17.6 | +20.4 | 27 |
| Operational Transparency | 26.4 | 13.7 | +12.7 | 27 |
| Access Clarity | 37.3 | 26.5 | +10.8 | 27 |
| Discoverability | 62.7 | 58.1 | +4.6 | 27 |
| Contract Governance | 10.8 | 6.3 | +4.5 | 27 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 19% | 14% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 19% | 12% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 30% | 11% | +19 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 14% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Token.io 70
- 2 Trustly Group 65.4
- 3 Moneyhub 57.1
- 4 VoPay 57
- 5 Azupay 56.2
- 6 Zai 55.8
- 7 Fintecture 54.5
- 8 Modulr 53.9
- 9 Zepto 52.9
- 10 Pinch Payments 51.7
- 1 Token.io 53.6
- 2 Modulr 49.7
- 3 Trustly Group 46
- 4 Zai 44.1
- 5 Zepto 43.6
- 6 Moneyhub 42.4
- 7 Azupay 40.8
- 8 Pinch Payments 38.8
- 9 VoPay 38.6
- 10 Tribe Payments 35.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.