Weather
Providers using this tag (96)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 20 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 24 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 31 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (82)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 24 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (27)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Weather” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 93 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Weather, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 30.4 | 17.6 | +12.8 | 93 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 27.3 | 23.2 | +4.1 | 93 |
| Discoverability | 61.4 | 58.1 | +3.3 | 93 |
| Operational Transparency | 16.1 | 13.7 | +2.4 | 93 |
| Contract Governance | 8.4 | 6.3 | +2.1 | 93 |
| Access Clarity | 27.3 | 26.5 | +0.8 | 93 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 16% | 14% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 12% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 4% | 11% | -7 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 31% | 14% | +17 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 HERE 71.2
- 2 Cracked API 70.3
- 3 Dynamic Feed 69
- 4 Tomorrow.io 63.8
- 5 OpenWeatherMap 61.9
- 6 APIVerve 60.8
- 7 APIFreaks - API Hub for Developers 57.9
- 8 2s 54.1
- 9 Atmospore Pollen Forecasts 53.6
- 10 Solcast 52.8
- 1 Cracked API 68.5
- 2 HERE 55.9
- 3 APIVerve 50
- 4 2s 47.3
- 5 Dynamic Feed 38.2
- 6 Atmospore Pollen Forecasts 37.7
- 7 APIFreaks - API Hub for Developers 35.9
- 8 Meteomatics 35.8
- 9 Sunrise Sunset 35.8
- 10 World Air Quality Index (WAQI) 35.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.