Maps
MapMaps
Providers using this tag (44)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (92)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 22 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 28 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (38)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Maps” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 44 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Maps, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 37 | 17.6 | +19.4 | 44 |
| Access Clarity | 40.2 | 26.5 | +13.7 | 44 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.2 | 13.7 | +11.5 | 44 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 32.9 | 23.2 | +9.7 | 44 |
| Discoverability | 65.8 | 58.1 | +7.7 | 44 |
| Contract Governance | 8.7 | 6.3 | +2.4 | 44 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 25% | 14% | +11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 12% | +6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 11% | -2 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 11% | 2% | +9 |
| Governance rules | 36% | 14% | +22 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 HERE 71.2
- 2 Esri 70.4
- 3 Tomorrow.io 63.8
- 4 positionstack 62.4
- 5 OpenWeatherMap 61.9
- 6 Amazon Location Service 59
- 7 Serper 56.3
- 8 Zenserp 56
- 9 Azure Maps 51.1
- 10 Google Maps Platform 50.9
- 1 HERE 55.9
- 2 Esri 50.8
- 3 Mapbox 44.6
- 4 Felt 35.4
- 5 TomTom 35.2
- 6 Zenserp 33.3
- 7 Tomorrow.io 32.6
- 8 Google Places 30.8
- 9 Serper 30.3
- 10 Geoapify 30
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.