emerging · 1.2 marketcapability domainresource

Oracle

Score 22.1 / 100 40 providers +13 via APIs 27 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
AI Model Services 1
Variants seen in the corpus: OraclesOracle

Providers using this tag (40)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (27)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (13)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Oracle” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Agent Exchange AINumbers.co anchor-x402 Atomadic Tech Blockdaemon ChainRay DNOW Drconsulta2 Euler Finance GMX HumanMirror khotem-com THORChain

Score breakdown

Frequency
48.7
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
45.5
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
4.6
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Price Feeds 5 co-occurrences DeFi 15 co-occurrences Smart Contracts 8 co-occurrences Vault 5 co-occurrences NFT 6 co-occurrences Rewards 5 co-occurrences x402 5 co-occurrences Database 7 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag40
Api tag27
Openapi tag11
Openapi op tag25

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 39 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Oracle, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
39
of 40 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
38.9
+16.1 vs catalog 22.8
Mean Agent Readiness
22.9
+9.6 vs catalog 13.3
Spread
0–76.9
median 43.4 · σ 18.3
How the 39 split by band
Exemplar 3Strong 4Developing 15Thin 5Emerging 8Minimal 4
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 48.6 22.1 +26.5 39
Contract Quality 36.8 18.2 +18.6 39
Operational Transparency 29 12.4 +16.6 39
Access Clarity 33.6 25 +8.6 39
Discoverability 63.4 57.9 +5.5 39
Contract Governance 13.6 9.4 +4.2 39

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 18% 16% +2
MCP server (first-party) 10% 14% -4
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 23% 13% +10
Security 100% 98% +2
Arazzo workflows 13% 2% +11
Governance rules 67% 35% +32

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 76.9
  2. 2 Oracle Siebel 68.9
  3. 3 Oracle 68.6
  4. 4 AmunCore 59.4
  5. 5 Oracle E-Business Suite 58.4
  6. 6 Aeternity 55
  7. 7 Tessell 54.8
  8. 8 CrowdTwist 53.5
  9. 9 Responsys 51.6
  10. 10 Oracle Enterprise Manager 50.6
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 AmunCore 56.5
  2. 2 Oracle 56.3
  3. 3 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 52.1
  4. 4 Pyth 46.3
  5. 5 Aeternity 45.2
  6. 6 Supra 35.4
  7. 7 Oracle Siebel 35.1
  8. 8 Oracle Database 34.9
  9. 9 Oracle E-Business Suite 32.6
  10. 10 Oracle Health (Cerner) 30.1
All 40 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 39 carry a score (98%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 30 of 39 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 7 November 2026, across 38912 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/oracle"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.