Providers using this tag (61)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 26 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (63)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 26 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 61 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Me, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 55.8 | 17.5 | +38.3 | 61 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 38.4 | 17.9 | +20.5 | 61 |
| Operational Transparency | 28.7 | 11.3 | +17.4 | 61 |
| Access Clarity | 39.7 | 22.3 | +17.4 | 61 |
| Discoverability | 74.8 | 60.4 | +14.4 | 61 |
| Contract Governance | 13.9 | 6.4 | +7.5 | 61 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 43% | 16% | +27 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 20% | 7% | +13 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 38% | 9% | +29 |
| Security | 98% | 88% | +10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 31% | 13% | +18 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Solo.io 68.4
- 2 Common Room 67.7
- 3 Adyen 67.1
- 4 Bentley Systems 64.1
- 5 Figma 63.8
- 6 Hootsuite 63.3
- 7 Airtm 62.8
- 8 Goody 61.3
- 9 Paragraph 60.8
- 10 Lithium 60.2
- 1 Automattic 62.3
- 2 Common Room 60.8
- 3 Goody 59.5
- 4 Figma 53.2
- 5 VideoAmp 53.1
- 6 Airtm 49.8
- 7 ALTR 47.9
- 8 Salesloft 47.9
- 9 Narmi 42.5
- 10 Paragraph 42.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/me"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/me"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/me/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.