Japan
Providers using this tag (123)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 20 Limited public surface area
Emerging 33 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 56 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (9)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 118 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Japan, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 59.1 | 58.1 | +1 | 118 |
| Access Clarity | 26 | 26.5 | -0.5 | 118 |
| Contract Governance | 5.3 | 6.3 | -1 | 118 |
| Operational Transparency | 11.7 | 13.7 | -2 | 118 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.6 | 23.2 | -4.6 | 118 |
| Contract Quality | 11.3 | 17.6 | -6.3 | 118 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 14% | -5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 12% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 11% | -5 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 6% | 14% | -8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 LINE 71.8
- 2 PAY.JP 70.8
- 3 3-shake 57
- 4 Soracom 55.1
- 5 HORIZON SHIELD 54.2
- 6 SUPER STUDIO 53.2
- 7 JPX (Japan Exchange Group) 51.6
- 8 MeetsMore 47.8
- 9 University of Tokyo 45.3
- 10 Acall 44
- 1 KG-NINJA 54.9
- 2 LINE 44.9
- 3 SUPER STUDIO 39.1
- 4 HORIZON SHIELD 36.2
- 5 Paidy 36.2
- 6 Agri Info Design 31.8
- 7 Logiless 31
- 8 PayPay 30.3
- 9 University of Tokyo 30
- 10 Soracom 29.8
Coverage caveat. 102 of 118 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.