Embedding
Embeddingembedding
Providers using this tag (31)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (34)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 31 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Embedding, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 45.2 | 17.5 | +27.7 | 31 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.1 | 17.9 | +17.2 | 31 |
| Operational Transparency | 25 | 11.3 | +13.7 | 31 |
| Access Clarity | 33.4 | 22.3 | +11.1 | 31 |
| Discoverability | 65.9 | 60.4 | +5.5 | 31 |
| Contract Governance | 10.7 | 6.4 | +4.3 | 31 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 23% | 16% | +7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 7% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 9% | +4 |
| Security | 97% | 88% | +9 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 52% | 13% | +39 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Unified.to 60.4
- 2 Hex 53.7
- 3 DocuSeal 50.2
- 4 Felt 48.4
- 5 Google Data Studio 48.4
- 6 Tableau 46.6
- 7 Qlik Sense 46.4
- 8 CodeSandbox 45.7
- 9 Cvent 45.4
- 10 Zenlytic 43.7
- 1 Hex 37.6
- 2 Qlik Sense 30.7
- 3 Google Data Studio 30.6
- 4 Instagram 29.9
- 5 DocuSeal 29.1
- 6 Qlik Sense Enterprise 29
- 7 Google Looker Studio 28.7
- 8 Hex 28.4
- 9 instacart 28.3
- 10 Tableau 28.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/embedding"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/embedding"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/embedding/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.