Communities
Communitiescommunities
Providers using this tag (28)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (17)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 28 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Communities, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 52.6 | 17.5 | +35.1 | 28 |
| Operational Transparency | 35.9 | 11.3 | +24.6 | 28 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.9 | 17.9 | +24 | 28 |
| Access Clarity | 44.1 | 22.3 | +21.8 | 28 |
| Contract Governance | 22.4 | 6.4 | +16 | 28 |
| Discoverability | 71.5 | 60.4 | +11.1 | 28 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 29% | 16% | +13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 7% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 46% | 9% | +37 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 18% | 2% | +16 |
| Governance rules | 54% | 13% | +41 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Xquik 92.3
- 2 Salesforce 83.3
- 3 ClickFunnels 64.3
- 4 Twitter/X 62.6
- 5 Antavo 62
- 6 X (Twitter) 54.9
- 7 Factorial 52.8
- 8 Salesforce Sales Cloud 51.1
- 9 Bluejay 49.8
- 10 Mavrck 49.8
- 1 Xquik 82.9
- 2 Salesforce 52.2
- 3 Twitter/X 50.6
- 4 Bluejay 38.6
- 5 ClickFunnels 35.6
- 6 ETH Zurich – Swiss Federal Institute of Technology 35
- 7 Factorial 34.2
- 8 Antavo 34
- 9 University of the Witwatersrand 33.1
- 10 University of Edinburgh 32.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.