Broadcast
Variants seen in the corpus:
Broadcastbroadcast
Providers using this tag (29)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (15)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Livepeer React Broadcast ComponentReact component for in-browser WebRTC broadcasting to a Livepeer live stream, with device selection and set...SuprSend Broadcast APIThe Broadcast API from SuprSend — 1 operation(s) for broadcast.ManyChat Sending APISend Dynamic Block content and trigger automations for a subscriber across Messenger, Instagram and WhatsAp...Supabase Realtime APIThe Supabase Realtime API provides WebSocket-based subscriptions for real-time data changes from PostgreSQL...CrunchDAO broadcast APIThe broadcast API from CrunchDAO — 2 operation(s) for broadcast.Chatfuel Broadcasting APIProgrammatically send messages and trigger flows/blocks to a specific bot user on Messenger, Instagram, or ...
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Blockchair Broadcast APISigned transaction broadcasting.IBroadcastServiceIBroadcastService exposes Steam game-broadcast metadata and stream-discovery endpoints used for in-app broa...Eyevinn Open IntercomOpen Intercom is a low-latency, web-based VoIP broadcast intercom system built on WebRTC. It is composed of...FCC Public Inspection Files APIProvides programmatic access to public inspection files for broadcast, cable, satellite, and wireless telec...1inch Transaction Gateway APISubmission gateway that broadcasts signed transactions and tracks status across supported EVM chains.
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Frequency
42.4
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.8
spread across providers
Quality lift
38.7
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
1.8
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Streaming 8 co-occurrences
Video 5 co-occurrences
Messaging 5 co-occurrences
Media 6 co-occurrences
User 5 co-occurrences
Analytics 5 co-occurrences
Authentication 5 co-occurrences
Company 10 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Api tag16
Provider tag13
Openapi tag7
Openapi op tag11
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 29 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Broadcast, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
29
all scored
Mean Kin Score
32.2
+11.5 vs catalog 20.7
Mean Agent Readiness
17.4
+7.7 vs catalog 9.7
Spread
5–65.7
median 32.3 · σ 19.5
How the 29 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 5Developing 6Thin 8Emerging 2Minimal 8
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 35.5 | 17.5 | +18 | 29 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 29.6 | 17.9 | +11.7 | 29 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.7 | 11.3 | +11.4 | 29 |
| Discoverability | 68.1 | 60.4 | +7.7 | 29 |
| Access Clarity | 29.6 | 22.3 | +7.3 | 29 |
| Contract Governance | 12.4 | 6.4 | +6 | 29 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 31% | 16% | +15 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 7% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 9% | +1 |
| Security | 93% | 88% | +5 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 24% | 13% | +11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Sendcloud 65.7
- 2 Dolby.io 65.5
- 3 Lithium 60.2
- 4 Crescendo Lab 59.1
- 5 Livepeer 54.6
- 6 ManyChat 51.6
- 7 SuprSend 51.3
- 8 Luma Health 48.9
- 9 CrunchDAO 44.3
- 10 Supabase 42.3
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Sendcloud 42.9
- 2 Crescendo Lab 38.2
- 3 ManyChat 35.8
- 4 Lithium 35.7
- 5 SuprSend 33
- 6 Supabase 29.6
- 7 Luma Health 29
- 8 Amagi 27.8
- 9 Dolby.io 27.5
- 10 Restream 24.8
All 29 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in
the catalog.Generated from the catalog build of
25 August 2026, across 26891
providers, using the same computation served by the
APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of
5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.