AI Governance
AI GovernanceAIGovernance
Providers using this tag (63)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 24 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (13)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “AI Governance” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 63 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged AI Governance, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.2 | 23.4 | +9.8 | 63 |
| Access Clarity | 33.2 | 26.5 | +6.7 | 63 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.2 | 14 | +4.2 | 63 |
| Contract Governance | 7.9 | 6.4 | +1.5 | 63 |
| Discoverability | 62.6 | 61.2 | +1.4 | 63 |
| Contract Quality | 20.8 | 19.8 | +1 | 63 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 21% | 10% | +11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 21% | 13% | +8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 11% | -1 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 14% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 OneTrust 68.2
- 2 Barndoor 65.1
- 3 Seekr 61.3
- 4 Transcend 54.1
- 5 Fiddler Labs 53.8
- 6 ActiveFence 51.3
- 7 TrustArc 50.6
- 8 Credo AI 50.3
- 9 ArthurAI 48.3
- 10 MINE 48
- 1 Larridin 53.1
- 2 OneTrust 51.6
- 3 ArthurAI 41.5
- 4 TrustArc 38.7
- 5 Seekr 35.8
- 6 MINE 35.4
- 7 MCP Manager 32.9
- 8 Credo AI 30.8
- 9 ActiveFence 30.4
- 10 Fiddler Labs 28.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.