AI Governance
Providers using this tag (70)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 11 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (16)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “AI Governance” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 70 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged AI Governance, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.2 | 23.2 | +12 | 70 |
| Access Clarity | 36.6 | 26.5 | +10.1 | 70 |
| Operational Transparency | 20 | 13.7 | +6.3 | 70 |
| Discoverability | 61.7 | 58.1 | +3.6 | 70 |
| Contract Quality | 20.4 | 17.6 | +2.8 | 70 |
| Contract Governance | 8.4 | 6.3 | +2.1 | 70 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 29% | 14% | +15 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 26% | 12% | +14 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 4% | 14% | -10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 OneTrust 72.7
- 2 TaskHawk Systems 69.4
- 3 Airia 63.5
- 4 Seekr 63
- 5 Barndoor 62
- 6 ArthurAI 58.7
- 7 Council of AI 57.3
- 8 Fiddler Labs 54.8
- 9 Credo AI 54.7
- 10 TrustArc 52.5
- 1 OneTrust 55.9
- 2 Larridin 53.1
- 3 TaskHawk Systems 48.8
- 4 Airia 48.8
- 5 Stackmint 42.1
- 6 ArthurAI 41.5
- 7 Council of AI 39.5
- 8 TrustArc 38.7
- 9 Verified Digital Agents (VDA) 37.1
- 10 Seekr 35.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.