AI Governance
Variants seen in the corpus:
AI GovernanceAi Governanceai-governance
Providers using this tag (68)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 24 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (14)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
ServiceNow AI Assets APIThe ServiceNow AI Assets API provides REST endpoints to retrieve, update, and create AI assets such as syst...IBM Knowledge CatalogDiscover, catalog, categorize, and govern data assets and AI models with an intelligent data catalog for en...IBM watsonx.governanceMonitor and manage AI models with an enterprise-grade environment that provides visibility into how AI is b...
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Lunar MCPX GatewayThe Lunar MCPX Gateway is an agent-native Model Context Protocol gateway that governs tool invocation for A...Credo AI Audit Logs & Shadow AI APIOpenAPI 3.0.0 contract covering the audit-log and Shadow AI slice of the Credo AI v2 API — listing, filteri...Credo AI Governance Intelligence Pro MCP ServerProvider-published Model Context Protocol server ("governance-hub") distributed as the npm package @credoai...Credo AI Governance Platform API (v2)Multi-tenant JSON:API REST interface to the Credo AI Governance Platform. 300 operations across 26 tags cov...
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Secuvy PlatformAI-driven data security and privacy platform delivering data discovery, classification, DSPM, privacy autom...CloudNuro AI CustodianAI workload oversight, governance, and cost allocation for enterprise AI usage.Collibra AI Command CenterThe Collibra AI Command Center provides a unified control plane for governing enterprise AI systems with co...
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Frequency
52.1
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.9
spread across providers
Quality lift
34.2
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
AI Security 13 co-occurrences
Guardrails 9 co-occurrences
Model Monitoring 6 co-occurrences
AI Observability 5 co-occurrences
CCPA 5 co-occurrences
Data Governance 9 co-occurrences
Enterprise AI 7 co-occurrences
Data Privacy 5 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag62
Api tag14
Openapi tag2
Openapi op tag5
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 68 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged AI Governance, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
68
all scored
Mean Kin Score
28.4
+7.7 vs catalog 20.7
Mean Agent Readiness
12.8
+3.1 vs catalog 9.7
Spread
4.3–64.8
median 27.2 · σ 17
How the 68 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 5Developing 15Thin 15Emerging 24Minimal 9
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 31.1 | 17.9 | +13.2 | 68 |
| Access Clarity | 34.1 | 22.3 | +11.8 | 68 |
| Operational Transparency | 16.8 | 11.3 | +5.5 | 68 |
| Contract Quality | 21.5 | 17.5 | +4 | 68 |
| Discoverability | 64.3 | 60.4 | +3.9 | 68 |
| Contract Governance | 10 | 6.4 | +3.6 | 68 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 37% | 16% | +21 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 7% | +11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 9% | +1 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 13% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 ServiceNow 64.8
- 2 Barndoor 64.7
- 3 IBM 62.6
- 4 Seekr 61.3
- 5 Fiddler Labs 54.4
- 6 Lunar 52.9
- 7 ActiveFence 51.6
- 8 MINE 50.9
- 9 Transcend 50.5
- 10 Moonbounce 49
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Larridin 53.1
- 2 MINE 41.9
- 3 ArthurAI 41.5
- 4 IBM 39.4
- 5 Seekr 35.8
- 6 ServiceNow 35.3
- 7 MCP Manager 32.9
- 8 QuantCDN 32.3
- 9 Arthur AI 31.5
- 10 ActiveFence 30.4
All 68 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in
the catalog.Generated from the catalog build of
25 August 2026, across 26891
providers, using the same computation served by the
APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of
5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/ai-governance"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/ai-governance"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/ai-governance/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.