Guardrails
Guardrailsguardrails
Providers using this tag (35)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 21 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (20)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 35 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Guardrails, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.8 | 17.9 | +22.9 | 35 |
| Contract Quality | 37.6 | 17.5 | +20.1 | 35 |
| Operational Transparency | 30.6 | 11.3 | +19.3 | 35 |
| Access Clarity | 39.1 | 22.3 | +16.8 | 35 |
| Discoverability | 72.4 | 60.4 | +12 | 35 |
| Contract Governance | 10.3 | 6.4 | +3.9 | 35 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 40% | 16% | +24 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 26% | 7% | +19 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 9% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 17% | 13% | +4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Civic 54.7
- 2 Fiddler Labs 54.4
- 3 H2O.ai 51.9
- 4 ActiveFence 51.6
- 5 Portkey 51.3
- 6 Comet 49
- 7 ArthurAI 48.4
- 8 Opik 48.2
- 9 Aleph Alpha 47.9
- 10 Vijil 47.6
- 1 H2O.ai 46.9
- 2 ArthurAI 41.5
- 3 Galileo Technologies 37.9
- 4 Portkey 36
- 5 Comet 32.5
- 6 Arthur AI 31.5
- 7 ActiveFence 30.4
- 8 Aleph Alpha 29.9
- 9 Gray Swan 29.3
- 10 Vijil 29.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.