AI Security
Providers using this tag (60)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 27 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 11 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (9)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “AI Security” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
60 providers carry this tag directly, and 62 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 2 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 57 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged AI Security, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 34.2 | 26.5 | +7.7 | 57 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 26.7 | 23.4 | +3.3 | 57 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.5 | 14 | +1.5 | 57 |
| Discoverability | 61.7 | 61 | +0.7 | 57 |
| Contract Governance | 7 | 6.5 | +0.5 | 57 |
| Contract Quality | 16.5 | 20.1 | -3.6 | 57 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 21% | 10% | +11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 30% | 13% | +17 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 4% | 11% | -7 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 13% | -6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 AppOmni 58.3
- 2 BigID 54
- 3 Fiddler Labs 53.8
- 4 ActiveFence 51.3
- 5 SandboxAQ 49.6
- 6 AccuKnox 47
- 7 Mend 46.7
- 8 fiddler.ai 46.6
- 9 Plerion 46.3
- 10 Alice 44.2
- 1 AppOmni 36.7
- 2 AccuKnox 31.5
- 3 ActiveFence 30.4
- 4 Silmaril 30.2
- 5 BigID 29.7
- 6 Fiddler Labs 28.6
- 7 Plerion 27.2
- 8 Alice 27.2
- 9 Gray Swan 27.2
- 10 SandboxAQ 26.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.