Enterprise AI
Providers using this tag (59)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (1)
Score breakdown
Frequency
49.0
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.5
spread across providers
Quality lift
26.1
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
5.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
AI Governance 8 co-occurrences
MLOps 6 co-occurrences
RAG 7 co-occurrences
Knowledge Management 5 co-occurrences
LLM 14 co-occurrences
AI Agents 24 co-occurrences
Generative AI 7 co-occurrences
Machine Learning 22 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag59
Api tag1
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 54 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Enterprise AI, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
54
of 59 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
22.8
-0.1 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
11
-0.9 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
3.3–73
median 15.1 · σ 17.2
How the 54 split by band
Exemplar 1Strong 3Developing 7Thin 8Emerging 17Minimal 18
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.5 | 23.2 | +2.3 | 54 |
| Discoverability | 59.8 | 58.1 | +1.7 | 54 |
| Contract Governance | 7 | 6.3 | +0.7 | 54 |
| Access Clarity | 26.3 | 26.5 | -0.2 | 54 |
| Operational Transparency | 11.8 | 13.7 | -1.9 | 54 |
| Contract Quality | 13.1 | 17.6 | -4.5 | 54 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 28% | 14% | +14 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 24% | 12% | +12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 14% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
All 59 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 54 carry a score (92%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 49 of 54 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 49 of 54 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.