Shasta Ventures
Shasta Ventures is an early-stage venture capital firm founded in 2004 and based in Silicon Valley (Portola Valley / Menlo Park, on and around Sand Hill Road, California). Founded by Rob Coneybeer and Ravi Mohan (with Tod Francis and Jason Pressman among its long-tenured Managing Directors), the firm invests primarily at the Series A stage in United States technology startups, typically leading rounds and taking board seats. Shasta has roughly $1.3B under management across multiple funds (Fund II $250M, Fund III $265M, Fund IV $300M) and a 20-year track record. Its thesis centers on enterprise software / SaaS, cybersecurity, developer tools and infrastructure, data intelligence, camera / computer vision, and consumer subscription products, pairing capital with operational support (Shasta Elevate) for technical founders. Notable investments include Anaplan, Zuora, Nest, Nextdoor, Apptio, Eero, Sendbird, Tonal, Lattice, Highspot, SentinelOne and Turo, with 12 unicorns, multiple IPOs and dozens of acquisitions across its history.
Shasta Ventures has 29 portfolio companies tracked on the APIs.io network, of which 13 (45%) publish APIs indexed here. The remaining 16 are tracked as profiles without a published API on the network.
Its highest-rated API providers on the network are Leanplum, Mint, Nest, Brandcast, Sendbird.
Portfolio on the Network
Portfolio companies that publish APIs indexed on APIs.io, grouped by their API Evangelist rating. Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Properties
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 27 portfolio companies with APIs in the catalog, backed by Shasta Ventures, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Transparency | 18.2 | 13.6 | +4.6 | 27 |
| Contract Quality | 20.9 | 17.6 | +3.3 | 27 |
| Access Clarity | 28.4 | 26.4 | +2 | 27 |
| Contract Governance | 6.9 | 6.3 | +0.6 | 27 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 21 | 23.1 | -2.1 | 27 |
| Discoverability | 54 | 58.2 | -4.2 | 27 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 22% | 15% | +7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 12% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 19% | 13% | +6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Coverage caveat. 21 of 27 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 3 October 2026, across 28834 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Source (apis.yml)
Work with this as data
Every firm here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.