Wireless
Providers using this tag (59)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 31 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (10)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (5)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Wireless” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 47 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Wireless, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 23.8 | 23.2 | +0.6 | 47 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.5 | 13.7 | -1.2 | 47 |
| Discoverability | 56.7 | 58.1 | -1.4 | 47 |
| Contract Governance | 4.6 | 6.3 | -1.7 | 47 |
| Contract Quality | 12.4 | 17.6 | -5.2 | 47 |
| Access Clarity | 18.9 | 26.5 | -7.6 | 47 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 14% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 12% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 11% | -3 |
| Security | 96% | 98% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 6% | 14% | -8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Mist 59.6
- 2 Cisco Catalyst Center 58.3
- 3 Verizon 57.3
- 4 AT&T 49.7
- 5 Celona 46.2
- 6 Aruba 44
- 7 Tarana Wireless 41.6
- 8 Extreme Networks 37.5
- 9 steute Technologies 36.5
- 10 Atmosic 34.9
- 1 Cisco Catalyst Center 37.4
- 2 Verizon 35.8
- 3 AT&T 34.5
- 4 Tarana Wireless 33.5
- 5 Cisco Meraki 31.2
- 6 Mist 29.3
- 7 Extreme Networks 29.1
- 8 Celona 23.6
- 9 Aruba 22.3
- 10 steute Technologies 20
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.