niche · 0.7

Wi-Fi

Score 17.8 / 100 30 providers 9 APIs Search apis.io →
Variants seen in the corpus: Wi-FiWiFiWifi

Providers using this tag (30)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
ParticleIoTInternet of ThingsCellular2 APIs62.1ETSITelecommunicationsFranceStandardsStandards Body24 APIs56.6
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
UbiquitiNetworkingWiFiSwitchingRouting1 API52.6Google Maps PlatformEnvironmentGeocodingGeolocationMaps3 APIs52.5GoliothIoTDevice ManagementFirmwareZephyr1 API47.7MistCompanyNetworkingWireless1 API47.7BluesIoTCellularConnectivityDevice Management1 API47.1SPANEnergyHome EnergyElectrificationSmart Panel1 API46.4Juniper Mist AIArtificial IntelligenceAIOpsNetworking1 API43.9
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Extreme NetworksNetworkingWirelessWiredSwitching1 API39.1CommScope HoldingAccess PointsCablingConnectivityICX Switches1 API33.1Cypress SemiconductorAcquiredBluetoothCapSenseEmbedded Systems6 APIs32.6HERE TechnologiesMapsGeocodingRoutingLocation Services1 API31.7Federated WirelessCompanySpectrumCBRSWireless6 APIs27.6
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Plume (fka Plume Design)CompanySmart HomeWiFiNetworking24.0HPE Aruba NetworkingNetworkingSwitchingSD-WAN10 APIs23.1PlumeCompanyEnterpriseWiFiISP22.3TanazaCompanyWiFiNetworkingCloud Management1 API17.7EeroCompanyNetworkingWiFiMesh Networking13.5NileNetworkingEnterprise NetworkingNetwork As A ServiceNaaS13.0instabridgeCompanyWiFieSIMConnectivity12.0
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
LifemoteCompanyNetworkingBroadband7.3AerohiveCompanyNetworkingWirelessWiFi6.4XirrusCompanyWirelessNetworking5.7AirEyeCompanySecurityCybersecurityWireless5.5Bouffalo LabCompanySemiconductorsRISC-VMicrocontrollers5.3AirespaceCompanyNetworkingWireless5.0Luma HomeCompanySmart HomeNetworkingWiFi5.0AeroscoutCompanyReal-Time Location SystemsRTLSRFID2.2WiomCompanyConsumerInternetBroadband1.8

APIs with this tag (9)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
ETSI MEC 028 WLAN Information APIThe WLAN Access Information Service from ETSI GS MEC 028, exposing access-point, station and measurement in...56.6
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Geolocation APIDetermine device location using cell tower and Wi-Fi access point data.52.5Golioth LocationLocation service that resolves device position from cellular tower and Wi-Fi access-point observations subm...47.7SPAN Wifi APIThe Wifi API from SPAN — 2 operation(s) for wifi.46.4
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
RUCKUS SmartZone Public APIREST and OpenAPI surface for managing on-premises SmartZone controllers (SZ144, SZ300, vSZ-E, vSZ-H) and IC...33.1AIROC Wi-Fi (formerly WICED)AIROC Wi-Fi is the Infineon-rebranded Cypress WICED Wi-Fi stack and SDK, including the Wi-Fi Host Driver (W...32.6HERE Positioning APIHigh-precision indoor and outdoor positioning using Wi-Fi, cellular, and Bluetooth signals.31.76 GHz AFC Device InterfaceThe Automated Frequency Coordination system interface Federated Wireless operates for the 6 GHz band. On 20...27.6
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Tanaza Cloud APIProgrammatic access to the Tanaza Cloud dashboard data set across three documented API families — Network M...17.7

Score breakdown

Frequency
42.1
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.8
spread across providers
Quality lift
31.2
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
5.3
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Access Points 6 co-occurrences Wireless 9 co-occurrences Connectivity 7 co-occurrences Networking 15 co-occurrences Telecommunications 6 co-occurrences IoT 10 co-occurrences Organization 5 co-occurrences Webhook 5 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag24
Api tag9
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag2

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 30 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Wi-Fi, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
30
all scored
Mean Kin Score
26
+5.3 vs catalog 20.7
Mean Agent Readiness
12.5
+2.8 vs catalog 9.7
Spread
1.8–60.8
median 23.6 · σ 18.9
How the 30 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 2Developing 7Thin 5Emerging 7Minimal 9
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Contract Quality 26.9 17.5 +9.4 30
Operational Transparency 20.4 11.3 +9.1 30
Developer Ergonomics 25.6 17.9 +7.7 30
Access Clarity 23.3 22.3 +1 30
Contract Governance 6.4 6.4 0 30
Discoverability 60.2 60.4 -0.2 30

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 13% 16% -3
MCP server (first-party) 7% 7% 0
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 7% 9% -2
Security 87% 88% -1
Arazzo workflows 3% 2% +1
Governance rules 20% 13% +7

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Particle 60.8
  2. 2 ETSI 58.4
  3. 3 Ubiquiti 53.2
  4. 4 Blues 50.4
  5. 5 Google Maps Platform 49.8
  6. 6 Mist 49.7
  7. 7 SPAN 49
  8. 8 Juniper Mist AI 44.5
  9. 9 Golioth 42.9
  10. 10 Extreme Networks 32.8
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 ETSI 47.9
  2. 2 Blues 32.7
  3. 3 Mist 31.5
  4. 4 Google Maps Platform 29.9
  5. 5 Extreme Networks 29.1
  6. 6 Juniper Mist AI 28.4
  7. 7 SPAN 26.6
  8. 8 Federated Wireless 25.5
  9. 9 Ubiquiti 22.3
  10. 10 CommScope Holding 19.8
All 30 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in the catalog.Generated from the catalog build of 25 August 2026, across 26891 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag 
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/wi-fi"
All tags 
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort 
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/wi-fi"
The distribution (Pro) 
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/wi-fi/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no email required.

GitHub Google LinkedIn

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.