Network Management
Providers using this tag (32)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 14 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (13)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 32 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Network Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 25.6 | 17.5 | +8.1 | 32 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 26 | 17.9 | +8.1 | 32 |
| Operational Transparency | 14.2 | 11.3 | +2.9 | 32 |
| Discoverability | 62.2 | 60.4 | +1.8 | 32 |
| Contract Governance | 6.5 | 6.4 | +0.1 | 32 |
| Access Clarity | 18.9 | 22.3 | -3.4 | 32 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 16% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 7% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 9% | 0 |
| Security | 78% | 88% | -10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 28% | 13% | +15 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Cisco Catalyst Center 65.9
- 2 Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN 64.6
- 3 Ubiquiti 53.2
- 4 Infoblox 49.6
- 5 Cisco 46.4
- 6 Brocade 44
- 7 Ciena 43.6
- 8 Cisco Expressway 41.3
- 9 Amdocs 39.6
- 10 RouterOS 36.9
- 1 Cisco Catalyst Center 39.6
- 2 Cisco 36
- 3 Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN 31.3
- 4 Extreme Networks 29.1
- 5 Amdocs 23.7
- 6 Ciena 22.7
- 7 Aruba 22.3
- 8 Nokia NetAct 22.3
- 9 RouterOS 22.3
- 10 Ubiquiti 22.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/network-management"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/network-management"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/network-management/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.