Network Management
Providers using this tag (26)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Minimal 14 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (15)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (9)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Network Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 19 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Network Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 31.4 | 17.6 | +13.8 | 19 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.9 | 23.2 | +12.7 | 19 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.4 | 13.7 | +4.7 | 19 |
| Discoverability | 61.3 | 58.1 | +3.2 | 19 |
| Contract Governance | 7 | 6.3 | +0.7 | 19 |
| Access Clarity | 22.2 | 26.5 | -4.3 | 19 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 14% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 12% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 11% | 0 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 26% | 14% | +12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN 63.2
- 2 Cisco Catalyst Center 58.3
- 3 Infoblox 48.8
- 4 Aruba 44
- 5 Tarana Wireless 41.6
- 6 Ciena 38.1
- 7 Extreme Networks 37.5
- 8 128 Technology 37.1
- 9 NetBox 35.6
- 10 RouterOS 35.6
- 1 Cisco Catalyst Center 37.4
- 2 Tarana Wireless 33.5
- 3 Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN 33.1
- 4 Pica8 31.1
- 5 Extreme Networks 29.1
- 6 128 Technology 25.2
- 7 Ciena 22.7
- 8 Aruba 22.3
- 9 RouterOS 22.3
- 10 Nokia NetAct 22.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.