SD-WAN
Providers using this tag (26)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (10)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “SD-WAN” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 23 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged SD-WAN, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 49.3 | 23.4 | +25.9 | 23 |
| Contract Quality | 31.5 | 19.8 | +11.7 | 23 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.9 | 14 | +8.9 | 23 |
| Contract Governance | 10.9 | 6.4 | +4.5 | 23 |
| Discoverability | 65 | 61.2 | +3.8 | 23 |
| Access Clarity | 27.6 | 26.5 | +1.1 | 23 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 35% | 10% | +25 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 30% | 13% | +17 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 22% | 14% | +8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Orange Business 70.1
- 2 Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN 67.6
- 3 Graphiant 58.1
- 4 MEF 55.2
- 5 Juniper Mist AI 46.5
- 6 Cisco 45.3
- 7 Aruba 44.4
- 8 Cradlepoint 43.9
- 9 Amazon Cloud WAN 41.6
- 10 Aryaka 38.7
- 1 Orange Business 43.5
- 2 Cisco 36.7
- 3 Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN 33.1
- 4 Graphiant 30.7
- 5 Extreme Networks 29.1
- 6 MEF 28.4
- 7 Juniper Mist AI 28.4
- 8 Amazon Cloud WAN 28.1
- 9 128 Technology 25.2
- 10 Aruba 22.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.