niche · -2.1 marketcapability domainaction

WebRTC

Score 20.2 / 100 44 providers +8 via APIs 30 APIs Search apis.io →

Providers using this tag (44)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (30)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Livepeer Playback APIPlayback info endpoint returning HLS/WebRTC playback URLs and metadata for a stream or asset, plus access-c...39.2Livepeer React Broadcast ComponentReact component for in-browser WebRTC broadcasting to a Livepeer live stream, with device selection and set...39.2Plivo Endpoint APIThe Plivo Endpoint API manages SIP/WebRTC endpoints (username/password/alias) used by softphones, browser S...38.9lib-jitsi-meet (Low-Level JavaScript API)Low-level JavaScript library for building entirely custom video conferencing experiences on top of the Jits...33.3LiveKit RoomService APIServer-side Twirp API for managing rooms, participants, tracks, mute/unmute, and metadata.31.5LiveKit Signaling Protocol (WebSocket)Bi-directional WebSocket signaling protocol used by LiveKit clients to coordinate WebRTC sessions with the ...31.5Eyevinn Open IntercomOpen Intercom is a low-latency, web-based VoIP broadcast intercom system built on WebRTC. It is composed of...30.5Eyevinn SRT to WHEP BridgeA Rust service that ingests SRT (Secure Reliable Transport) contribution feeds and re-publishes them as Web...30.5Eyevinn WHIP and WHEP ModulesOpen source TypeScript implementations of the IETF WebRTC HTTP Ingestion Protocol (WHIP) and WebRTC HTTP Eg...30.5Agora Video Calling APIThe Agora Video Calling API enables real-time, interactive video communication with sub-200ms global latenc...30.3Perkoon Sessions APIThe anonymous REST surface under https://perkoon.com/api/v1 that every Perkoon client uses: POST /sessions ...27.6SightCall REST APISightCall's REST API is used by application back ends to request session tokens, manage users and sessions,...27.4Transports (WebRTC/WebSocket)Realtime media transport layer of the framework. Bidirectional audio, video, and data flow over Daily WebRT...27.3
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (8)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “WebRTC” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

8x8 Cloudflare Livepeer Mend OpenAI Pipecat Plivo Roboflow

Score breakdown

Frequency
50.3
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.0
spread across providers
Quality lift
36.8
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Real-Time Communication 9 co-occurrences RTMP 8 co-occurrences SIP 8 co-occurrences HLS 7 co-occurrences Recording 12 co-occurrences Live Streaming 14 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag47
Api tag30
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag2

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 43 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged WebRTC, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
43
of 44 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
35.8
+13.6 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
22.1
+10.1 vs catalog 12
Spread
0–70
median 33.3 · σ 18.8
How the 43 split by band
Exemplar 3Strong 5Developing 9Thin 14Emerging 7Minimal 5
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 47.9 23.2 +24.7 43
Contract Quality 31.6 17.2 +14.4 43
Operational Transparency 27 13 +14 43
Access Clarity 33.2 23.9 +9.3 43
Discoverability 64.5 57.9 +6.6 43
Contract Governance 9.3 6.5 +2.8 43

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 21% 13% +8
MCP server (first-party) 23% 12% +11
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 9% 11% -2
Security 100% 98% +2
Arazzo workflows 2% 2% 0
Governance rules 21% 16% +5

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Regal 70
  2. 2 rtcStats 69.2
  3. 3 SignalWire 66.9
  4. 4 Dolby 65.5
  5. 5 Red5 63.6
  6. 6 Ant Media 58.5
  7. 7 Wowza 55
  8. 8 LVT 54.8
  9. 9 Anam.ai 54.2
  10. 10 100ms 50.9
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Runway 55.5
  2. 2 Regal 54.9
  3. 3 rtcStats 45.7
  4. 4 Anam.ai 43.6
  5. 5 Dolby 41.7
  6. 6 SignalWire 40
  7. 7 Wazo 35.8
  8. 8 Ring 34.5
  9. 9 Ant Media 32.2
  10. 10 Krisp 31.8
All 44 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 43 carry a score (98%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 38 of 43 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/webrtc"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/webrtc"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/webrtc/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.