niche · -1.6 marketcapability domainaction

WebRTC

Score 19.8 / 100 49 providers +9 via APIs 31 APIs Search apis.io →

Providers using this tag (49)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (31)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Livepeer Playback APIPlayback info endpoint returning HLS/WebRTC playback URLs and metadata for a stream or asset, plus access-c...39.2Livepeer React Broadcast ComponentReact component for in-browser WebRTC broadcasting to a Livepeer live stream, with device selection and set...39.2Plivo Endpoint APIThe Plivo Endpoint API manages SIP/WebRTC endpoints (username/password/alias) used by softphones, browser S...38.6Agora Video Calling APIThe Agora Video Calling API enables real-time, interactive video communication with sub-200ms global latenc...37.4LiveKit RoomService APIServer-side Twirp API for managing rooms, participants, tracks, mute/unmute, and metadata.34.3LiveKit Signaling Protocol (WebSocket)Bi-directional WebSocket signaling protocol used by LiveKit clients to coordinate WebRTC sessions with the ...34.3lib-jitsi-meet (Low-Level JavaScript API)Low-level JavaScript library for building entirely custom video conferencing experiences on top of the Jits...33.2Eyevinn Open IntercomOpen Intercom is a low-latency, web-based VoIP broadcast intercom system built on WebRTC. It is composed of...30.0Eyevinn SRT to WHEP BridgeA Rust service that ingests SRT (Secure Reliable Transport) contribution feeds and re-publishes them as Web...30.0Eyevinn WHIP and WHEP ModulesOpen source TypeScript implementations of the IETF WebRTC HTTP Ingestion Protocol (WHIP) and WebRTC HTTP Eg...30.0Transports (WebRTC/WebSocket)Realtime media transport layer of the framework. Bidirectional audio, video, and data flow over Daily WebRT...28.0SightCall REST APISightCall's REST API is used by application back ends to request session tokens, manage users and sessions,...27.5
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (9)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “WebRTC” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

8x8 Chatinbox Cloudflare Livepeer Mend OpenAI Pipecat Plivo Roboflow

Score breakdown

Frequency
48.1
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
38.2
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Real-Time Communication 10 co-occurrences RTMP 8 co-occurrences HLS 7 co-occurrences SIP 8 co-occurrences Recording 13 co-occurrences Live Streaming 15 co-occurrences WHIP 5 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag49
Api tag31
Openapi tag2
Openapi op tag3

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 48 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged WebRTC, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
48
of 49 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
39
+14.9 vs catalog 24.1
Mean Agent Readiness
23.2
+9.1 vs catalog 14.1
Spread
0–74.2
median 37.2 · σ 19.8
How the 48 split by band
Exemplar 4Strong 8Developing 10Thin 14Emerging 7Minimal 5
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 50.6 24.5 +26.1 48
Operational Transparency 28.3 13.2 +15.1 48
Contract Quality 33.6 18.6 +15 48
Access Clarity 41.4 30 +11.4 48
Discoverability 65 59.1 +5.9 48
Contract Governance 15 9.7 +5.3 48

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 21% 18% +3
MCP server (first-party) 25% 16% +9
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 8% 13% -5
Security 100% 99% +1
Arazzo workflows 2% 1% +1
Governance rules 65% 36% +29

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 SignalWire 74.2
  2. 2 Regal 71.6
  3. 3 rtcStats 71.5
  4. 4 Dolby 68.9
  5. 5 Anam.ai 64.9
  6. 6 Red5 63.8
  7. 7 Coviu 61.5
  8. 8 LVT 60.2
  9. 9 Ant Media 59.3
  10. 10 Decart 57.6
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Runway 55.5
  2. 2 Regal 54.9
  3. 3 rtcStats 53.2
  4. 4 Anam.ai 51.8
  5. 5 SignalWire 42.4
  6. 6 Dolby 41.7
  7. 7 Synento 38.8
  8. 8 Decart 38
  9. 9 Wazo 35.8
  10. 10 Ring 34.1
All 49 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 48 carry a score (98%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 38 of 48 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/webrtc"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.