Remote Sensing
Providers using this tag (58)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 22 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (5)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (4)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Remote Sensing” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 53 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Remote Sensing, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 63 | 61.2 | +1.8 | 53 |
| Contract Governance | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0 | 53 |
| Contract Quality | 19.1 | 19.8 | -0.7 | 53 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 21.6 | 23.4 | -1.8 | 53 |
| Operational Transparency | 11.5 | 14 | -2.5 | 53 |
| Access Clarity | 22.9 | 26.5 | -3.6 | 53 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 4% | 10% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 13% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 11% | 0 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 15% | 14% | +1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 NASA FIRMS 49.4
- 2 Maxar Technologies 48.8
- 3 Google Earth Engine REST 44.3
- 4 Umbra 44.2
- 5 NASA CMR 43.7
- 6 DLR 42.3
- 7 Sentinel Hub 42.2
- 8 Planet 40.8
- 9 Hydrosat 40.2
- 10 Capella Space 39.1
- 1 Umbra 47.8
- 2 CarbonFarm 36.9
- 3 Arlula 32.3
- 4 Aarav Unmanned Systems (Aereo) 31.9
- 5 Agromonitoring 30.6
- 6 GeoInsight 30.6
- 7 Maxar Technologies 29.8
- 8 NASA FIRMS 28.7
- 9 Sentinel Hub 26.9
- 10 Google Earth Engine REST 24.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.